Author:
Guo Mengqi,Zang Xuefeng,Fu Wenting,Yan Haoyi,Bao Xiangyuan,Li Tong,Qiao Jianping
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Nasal polyp (NP) and inverted papilloma (IP) are two common types of nasal masses. And their differentiation is essential for determining optimal surgical strategies and predicting outcomes. Thus, we aimed to develop several radiomic models to differentiate them based on computed tomography (CT)-extracted radiomic features.
Methods
A total of 296 patients with nasal polyps or papillomas were enrolled in our study. Radiomics features were extracted from non-contrast CT images. For feature selection, three methods including Boruta, random forest, and correlation coefficient were used. We choose three models, namely SVM, naive Bayes, and XGBoost, to perform binary classification on the selected features. And the data was validated with tenfold cross-validation. Then, the performance was assessed by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and related parameters.
Results
In this study, the performance ability of the models was in the following order: XGBoost > SVM > Naive Bayes. And the XGBoost model showed excellent AUC performance at 0.922, 0.9078, 0.9184, and 0.9141 under four conditions (no feature selection, Boruta, random forest, and correlation coefficient).
Conclusions
We demonstrated that CT-based radiomics plays a crucial role in distinguishing IP from NP. It can provide added diagnostic value by distinguishing benign nasal lesions and reducing the need for invasive diagnostic procedures and may play a vital role in guiding personalized treatment strategies and developing optimal therapies.
Critical relevance statement
Based on the extraction of radiomic features of tumor regions from non-contrast CT, optimized by radiomics to achieve non-invasive classification of IP and NP which provide support for respective therapy of IP and NP.
Key points
• CT images are commonly used to diagnose IP and NP.
• Radiomics excels in feature extraction and analysis.
• CT-based radiomics can be applied to distinguish IP from NP.
• Use multiple feature selection methods and classifier models.
• Derived from real clinical cases with abundant data.
Graphical Abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference35 articles.
1. Lawson W, Patel ZM (2009) The evolution of management for inverted papilloma: an analysis of 200 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:330–335
2. Long C, Jabarin B, Harvey A et al (2020) Clinical evidence based review and systematic scientific review in the identification of malignant transformation of inverted papilloma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 49:25
3. Mak W, Webb D, Al-Salihi S, Dadgostar A, Javer A (2018) Sinonasal inverted papilloma recurrence rates and evaluation of current staging systems. Rhinology 56:407–414
4. Mirza S, Bradley PJ, Acharya A, Stacey M, Jones NS (2007) Sinonasal inverted papillomas: recurrence, and synchronous and metachronous malignancy. J Laryngol Otol 121:857–864
5. Hopkins C (2019) Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. N Engl J Med 381:55–63
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Artificial Intelligence in Rhinology;Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America;2024-10