Artefacts in contrast enhanced digital mammography: how can they affect diagnostic image quality and confuse clinical diagnosis?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Artefacts in contrast enhanced digital mammography: how can they affect diagnostic image quality and confuse clinical diagnosis?

Published:2020-02-07 Issue:1 Volume:11 Page:
ISSN:1869-4101
Container-title:Insights into Imaging
language:en
Short-container-title:Insights Imaging

Author:

Nori Jacopo,Gill Maninderpal Kaur,Vignoli Chiara^ORCID,Bicchierai Giulia,De Benedetto Diego,Di Naro Federica,Vanzi Ermanno,Boeri Cecilia,Miele Vittorio

Abstract

AbstractContrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is a diagnostic tool for breast cancer detection. Artefacts are observed in about 10% of CEDM examinations. Understanding CEDM artefacts is important to prevent diagnostic misinterpretation. In this article, we have described the artefacts that we have commonly encountered in clinical practice; we hope to ease the recognition and help troubleshoot solutions to prevent or minimise them.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13244-019-0811-x.pdf

Reference12 articles.

1. Nori J, Kaur M (2018) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94553-8

2. Phillips J, Steinkeler J, Talati K et al (2018) Workflow considerations for incorporation of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography into a breast imaging practice. J Am Coll Radiol 15(6):881–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.02.012

3. Lalji UC, Jeukens CR, Houben I et al (2015) Evaluation of low-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria. Eur Radiol 25(10):2813–2820

4. Patel BK, Lobbes MBI, Lewin J (2017) Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: a review. Semin ultrasound CT MRI 39:70–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2017.08.005

5. Bhimani C, Li L, Liao L, Roth RG, Tinney E, Germaine P (2017) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: modality-specific artefacts and other factors which may interfere with image quality. Acad Radiol 24:89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.08.024

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Experimental results of the first prototype direct-indirect dual-layer flat-panel detector for contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis;17th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI 2024);2024-05-29

2. Empowering breast cancer diagnosis and radiology practice: advances in artificial intelligence for contrast-enhanced mammography;Frontiers in Radiology;2024-01-05

3. False-Positive and False-Negative Contrast-enhanced Mammograms: Pitfalls and Strategies to Improve Cancer Detection;RadioGraphics;2023-12-01

4. Investigation of test methods for QC in dual-energy based contrast-enhanced digital mammography systems: II. Artefacts/uniformity, exposure time and phantom-based dosimetry;Physics in Medicine & Biology;2023-10-31

5. Investigation of test methods for QC in dual-energy based contrast-enhanced digital mammography systems: I. Iodine signal testing;Physics in Medicine & Biology;2023-10-31