Abstract
Abstract
Background
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of the GeneXpert® MTB/RIF (Xpert®), Auramine O staining method, and Lowenstein-Jensen medium for bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis and explore the effects of the sputum bacillary load (SBL) and qRT‒PCR threshold cycle (Ct) value on the detection methods.
Methods
We retrospectively analysed the results in the Department of Infectious Disease for 49 months. The χ2 test was used to compare the performances of each method, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off values, and the factors associated with a false-negative result from Xpert® were analysed by logistic regression.
Results
Simultaneous analysis of 980 sputum specimens showed that the positive detection rate of Xpert® did not increase with increasing SBL, and there were differences between the three when SBL ≤ 1 + (all P < 0.05). There was a good negative correlation between the Ct value and the SBL (P < 0.0001). Age was an independent risk factor for false-negative Xpert® results (P = 0.029), and when Ct < 16, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were both 100.00%. The optimal cut-off Ct values for resegmentation based on the drug resistance classification were < 18.6, 18.6–34.1, and > 34.1 cycles.
Conclusions
Xpert® was not affected by SBL but it was by age, and it is more advantageous when SBL ≤ 1 + . The results regarding rifampicin resistance were reliable, and the novel Ct segmentation was a practical and more clinically meaningful classification method for diagnosing rifampicin resistance. These findings will help improve physicians’ ability to accurately diagnose TB.
Funder
the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi
the National Natural Science Foundation of China
the Shaanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation
the Innovation Platform for Infectious Disease Research of the Health Commission of Shaanxi Province
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Global health estimates: life expectancy and leading causes of death and disability. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death. Accessed 12 July 2021.
2. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2022. https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022. Accessed 22 Mar 2023.
3. Gopalaswamy R, Shanmugam S, Mondal R, Subbian S. Of tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections - a comparative analysis of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. J Biomed Sci. 2020;27(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-020-00667-6.
4. Karamat A, Ambreen A, Ishtiaq A, Tahseen S, Rahman MA, Mustafa T. Isolation of non-tuberculous mycobacteria among tuberculosis patients, a study from a tertiary care hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):381. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06086-8.
5. Girma S, Avanzi C, Bobosha K, Desta K, Idriss MH, Busso P, et al. Evaluation of Auramine O staining and conventional PCR for leprosy diagnosis: a comparative cross-sectional study from Ethiopia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(9):e0006706. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006706.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献