Author:
Chen Yonghuan,Zhang Zhendong,Zhu Qiuhan
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To explore the effect of exercise intervention on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), various exercise forms were compared and the sequence of the possibility of improving the effect of each exercise form was sorted out. We expect that our findings will provide clinicians and patients with more effective treatments and references.
Method
A thorough search was done on CNKI, Wanfang, WOS, Cochrane library, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and obtained the publication time from the database establishment to May 6, 2023. The relevant contents of the literature that passed the screening criteria were extracted, including relevant information about the sample, first author, intervention measures, intervention time, and outcome indicators. Analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.4 and Stata17.0.
Result
The study finally included 12 articles with 538 samples. After comparison, it was found that exercise interventions to reduce Cobb's angle were more effective than conventional therapies and reached a statistically significant difference. Compared with conventional therapy, core strength training, Physiotherapeutic Scoliosis-Specific Exercise (PSSE), yoga, Schroth, and sling reduced the Cobb angle by an average of 3.82 degrees, 3.79 degrees, 4.60 degrees, 3.63 degrees, and 3.30 degrees, respectively. However, the therapeutic effects on AIS did not show statistically significant differences between the exercise interventions. According to the SUCRA value and the cumulative probability, the MeanRank of improving the AIS effect by various sports intervention measures as follows: yoga (2.2), core strength training (2.8), PSSE (2.8), Schroth exercise (3.2), and sling exercise (4.0).
Conclusion
Exercise intervention can significantly improve AIS. There was no significant difference in the improvement effect of AIS among different exercise forms. Yoga may have the best effect on AIS improvement.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference58 articles.
1. Wu N. Advances in genetic research on skeletal dysplasia. Chin J Orthop Traumatol. 2021;34(05):365–70. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2021.05.10.
2. Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Cote P, Nouri A, Fehlings M, et al. The minimum clinically important difference of the modified japanese orthopaedic association scale in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001127.
3. Yang T, Zhao J, Ma T, Ji J, Chen Q, Zhang T, et al. Genetic and environmental etiology studies on congenital scoliosis: a review of progress. Chin J Orthop. 2020;28(15):5.
4. Zhang G. Comprehensive classification and treatment of thoracolumbar spine injury. Chin J Surg. 1989;27(2):4.
5. Asher M, Cook LT. The transverse plane evolution of the most common adolescent idiopathic scoliosis deformities. Spine. 1995;20(12):1386–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199520120-00010.