Abstract
AbstractSince the Green Revolution, worldwide agriculture has been characterized by a typical top–down approach. The degree of autonomy, creativity, and responsibility of farmers has been limited by the continuous external inputs of chemicals, machinery, advice, subsidies and knowledge.The issue of sustainability has brought complexity and uncertainty to this mainly linear process of innovation, steering agriculture toward alternative models. Agroecology represents an innovative paradigm of agriculture in which external inputs are minimized, and the assets of the farm are greatly valued. Agroecological production relies on the farmers’ direct management of resources and on their active engagement in the agricultural knowledge and innovation system.This paper focuses on the experience of a group of farmers, scientists, public officials, and managers of private companies who are experimenting with agroecology in rice production in one of the most intensively farmed, profitable and environmentally sensitive areas of Italy. The partnership regularly comes together to discuss agricultural techniques and results, needs, and paths of innovation; in addition, it stimulates and takes part in research projects, following a participatory process based on co-learning and mutual responsibility. By using ethnographic methods such as direct observations and in-depth interviews, our work may contribute to understanding the role of participatory research in sustainable agriculture and what makes for good participation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science
Reference99 articles.
1. Altieri MA (1989) Agroecology: a new research and development paradigm for world agriculture. Agric Ecosystems Environ 27(1):37–46
2. Altieri MA (2002) Agroecology: the science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agric Ecosystems Environ 93(1):1–24
3. Altieri M, Nicholls CI (2012) Agroecology scaling up for food sovereignty and resiliency. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 11, pp 1–29
4. Andrade AD (2009) Interpretive research aiming at theory building: adopting and adapting the case study design. Qual Rep 14(1):42–60
5. Augère-Granier, M.L. 2017. Agricultural education and lifelong training in the EU. European Parliamentary Research Service [WWW] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/608788/EPRS_BRI(2017)608788_EN.pdf (visited on 02/06/2020).
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献