Prehabilitation in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery: a feasibility study
-
Published:2022-08-23
Issue:1
Volume:11
Page:
-
ISSN:2047-0525
-
Container-title:Perioperative Medicine
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Perioper Med
Author:
Waterland Jamie L.ORCID, Ismail HilmyORCID, Granger Catherine L.ORCID, Patrick CameronORCID, Denehy LindaORCID, Riedel BernhardORCID, Beaumont Anna, Bruns Emma, Burbury Kate, Carty Danika, Chahal Rani, Christelis Georgina, Coleman Sonia, Crowe Jessica, Edbrooke Lara, Fairweather Melanie, Ftanou Maria, Graham Kate, Hall Travis, Harrison Simon, Heriot Alexander, Karabiyik Yesim, Kenchington Kay, Khot Amit, Kotowicz Erika, Lawrance Naomi, Leung Debra, Liu Iris, Loeliger Jenelle, Lynch Fiona, Martin Alicia, Norman Jamie, O’Brien Kat, Poulton Tom, Prickett Christina, Richardson Ian, Sinton Catherine, Siu Amanda, Traer Emily, Traill Anya,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patients presenting for major surgery with low cardiorespiratory fitness (deconditioning) and other modifiable risk factors are at increased risk of postoperative complications. This study investigated the feasibility of delivering prehabilitation in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery.
Methods
Eligible patients in this single-center cohort study included patients with poor fitness (objectively assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing, CPET) scheduled for elective major abdominal cancer surgery. Patients were recruited to participate in a prehabilitation program that spanned up to 6 weeks pre-operatively and comprised aerobic and resistance exercise training, breathing exercise, and nutritional support. The primary outcome assessed pre-specified feasibility targets: recruitment >70%, retention >85%, and intervention adherence >70%. Secondary outcomes were assessed for improved pre-operative functional status and health-related quality of life and for postoperative complications.
Results
Eighty-two (34%) out of 238 patients screened between April 2018 and December 2019 were eligible for recruitment. Fifty (61%) patients (52% males) with a median age of 71 (IQR, 63–77) years participated in the study. Baseline oxygen consumption the at anaerobic threshold and at peak exercise (mean±SD: 9.8±1.8 and 14.0±2.9 mL/kg/min, respectively) confirmed the deconditioned state of the study cohort. The retention rate within the prehabilitation program was 84%, with 42 participants returning for repeat CPET testing. While >60% of participants preferred to do home-based prehabilitation, adherence to the intervention was low—with only 12 (28%) and 15 (35%) of patients having self-reported compliance >70% with their exercise prescriptions.
Conclusion
Our prehabilitation program in high-risk cancer surgery patients did not achieve pre-specified targets for recruitment, retention, and self-reported program adherence. These findings underpin the importance of implementation research and strategies for the prehabilitation programs in major surgery.
Trial registration
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000073909) retrospectively registered.
Funder
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference69 articles.
1. Agasi-Idenburg CS, et al. “I am busy surviving” - views about physical exercise in older adults scheduled for colorectal cancer surgery. J Geriatr Oncol. 2020;11(3):444–50. 2. American Thoracic Society. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111–7. 3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Admitted patient care 2014–15: Australian hospital statistics, in health services series no. 68. Cat. No. HSE 172. Canberra: AIHW; 2016. 4. Barberan-Garcia A, et al. Personalised prehabilitation in high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery: a randomized blinded controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2018;267(1):50–6. 5. Beck A, et al. Investigating the experiences, thoughts, and feelings underlying and influencing prehabilitation among cancer patients: a qualitative perspective on the what, when, where, who, and why. Disabil and Rehabil. 2022;44(2):202–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1762770.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|