Author:
Matos Klayne Cunha,de Oliveira Vanessa Fernandes,de Oliveira Paula Luanna Carvalho,Carvalho Fabíola Aureliano,de Mesquita Maria Renata Matos,da Silva Queiroz Camila Gabriella,Marques Levi Mota,Lima Débora Lilian Nascimento,Carvalho Fernanda Martins Maia,Braga-Neto Pedro
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Stroke is the main cause of oropharyngeal neurogenic dysphagia. Electrostimulation has been used as a therapeutic tool in these cases. However, there are few studies that prove its effectiveness. We evaluated the effect of functional electrostimulation as a complement to conventional speech therapy in patients with dysphagia after a stroke in a stroke unit.
Methods
We performed a clinical, randomized, and controlled trial divided into intervention group (IG) (n = 16) and control group (CG) (n = 17). All patients were treated with conventional speech therapy, and the IG also was submitted to the functional electrotherapy. Primary outcomes were Functional Oral Ingestion Scale (FOIS) and Swallowing videoendoscopy (FEES). The degree of dysphagia was scored in functional, mild, moderate and severe dysphagia according to FEES procedure. Dysphagia Risk Evaluation Protocol (DREP) was considered a secondary outcome.
Results
There was a significant difference regarding FOIS scores after 5 days of intervention in groups. Both groups also showed a tendency to improve dysphagia levels measured by FEES, although not statistically significant. Improvements on oral feeding was seen in both groups. No significant differences between groups before and after the intervention were detected by DREP scores. Electrical stimulation did not show additional benefits beyond conventional therapy when comparing outcomes between groups.
Conclusion
Conventional speech therapy improved oral ingestion even regardless the use of electrostimulation in a stroke unit.
Trial registration
This research was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03649295) in 28/08/2018 and in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) (Register Number: RBR-56QK5J), approval date: 18/12/2018. HGF Ethics Committee Approval Number: N. 2.388.931.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Neurology (clinical),General Medicine
Reference49 articles.
1. De Carvalho JJF, Alves MB, Viana GÁA, et al. Stroke epidemiology, patterns of management, and outcomes in Fortaleza, Brazil: A hospital-based multicenter prospective study. Stroke. 2011;42(12):3341–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.626523.
2. Drozdz D, Mancopes R, Silva AMT, Reppold C. Analysis of the level of Dysphagia, anxiety, and nutritional status before and after speech therapy in patients with stroke. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;18(2):172–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1364169.
3. Fukujima MM. Distúrbios neurológicos adquiridos: linguagem e cognição. In: Ortis KZ, ed. Second. Manole; 2010:34–46.
4. Padovani AR, Moraes DP, Mangili LD, de Andrade CRF. Dysphagia Risk evaluation protocol (PARD). Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia. 2007;12(3):199–205. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-80342007000300007.
5. Azer SA, Kshirsagar RK. Dysphagia. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献