Mapping of spastic muscle activity after stroke: difference between passive stretch and active contraction
-
Published:2024-06-14
Issue:1
Volume:21
Page:
-
ISSN:1743-0003
-
Container-title:Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J NeuroEngineering Rehabil
Author:
Xie Tian,Leng Yan,Xu Pan,Li Le,Song Rong
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Investigating the spatial distribution of muscle activity would facilitate understanding the underlying mechanism of spasticity. The purpose of this study is to investigate the characteristics of spastic muscles during passive stretch and active contraction by high-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG).
Methods
Fourteen spastic hemiparetic subjects and ten healthy subjects were recruited. The biceps brachii (BB) muscle activity of each subject was recorded by HD-sEMG during passive stretch at four stretch velocities (10, 60, 120, 180˚/s) and active contraction at three submaximal contraction levels (20, 50, 80%MVC). The intensity and spatial distribution of the BB activity were compared by the means of two-way analysis of variance, independent sample t-test, and paired sample t-test.
Results
Compared with healthy subjects, spastic hemiparetic subjects showed significantly higher intensity with velocity-dependent heterogeneous activation during passive stretch and more lateral and proximal activation distribution during active contraction. In addition, spastic hemiparetic subjects displayed almost non-overlapping activation areas during passive stretch and active contraction. The activation distribution of passive stretch was more distal when compared with the active contraction.
Conclusions
These alterations of the BB activity could be the consequence of deficits in the descending central control after stroke. The complementary spatial distribution of spastic BB activity reflected their opposite motor units (MUs) recruitment patterns between passive stretch and active contraction. This HD-sEMG study provides new neurophysiological evidence for the spatial relationship of spastic BB activity between passive stretch and active contraction, advancing our knowledge on the mechanism of spasticity.
Trial registration
ChiCTR2000032245.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation
Guangzhou Research Collaborative Innovation Projects
Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Natural Science Foundation of China
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Guangdong Science and Technology Plan Project
Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan Project
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Lance JW. The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement: Robert Wartenbeg Lecture. Neurology. 1980;12:1303–1303.
2. Zorowitz RD, Gillard PJ, Brainin M. Poststroke spasticity: sequelae and burden on stroke survivors and caregivers. Neurology. 2013;80(3 SUPPL2):S45–52.
3. Opheim A, Danielsson A, Alt Murphy M, Persson HC, Sunnerhagen KS. Early prediction of long-term upper limb spasticity after stroke: part of the SAL GOT study. Neurology. 2015;85(10):873–80.
4. Sunnerhagen KS, Olver J, Francisco GE. Assessing and treating functional impairment in poststroke spasticity. Neurology. 2013;80(3 SUPPL2):S35.
5. Brainin M. Poststroke spasticity: treating to the disability. Neurology. 2013;80(3 SUPPL2):S1.