Effects of dynamic body weight support on functional independence measures in acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study
-
Published:2023-01-16
Issue:1
Volume:20
Page:
-
ISSN:1743-0003
-
Container-title:Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J NeuroEngineering Rehabil
Author:
Huber Justin,Elwert Nicholas,Powell Elizabeth Salmon,Westgate Philip M.,Hines Emily,Sawaki Lumy
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Stroke remains a major public health concern in the United States and a leading cause of long-term disability in adults. Dynamic body weight support (DBWS) systems are popular technology available for use in clinical settings such inpatient rehabilitation. However, there remains limited studies in such inpatient settings that compare DBWS to standard of care (SOC) using real world outcome measures. For survivors of acute ischemic stroke, we determine if incorporating a dynamic body weight support (DBWS) system into inpatient therapy offers greater improvement than standard of care (SOC).
Methods
A retrospective chart review included 52 individuals with an acute ischemic stroke admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Functional Independence Measure (FIM) data, specifically changes in FIM at discharge, served as the primary outcome measure. Patient cohorts received either therapies per SOC or therapies incorporating DBWS. Regardless of cohort group, all patients underwent therapies for 3 h per day for 5 days a week.
Results
For both groups, a statistically and clinically significant increase in total FIM (P < 0.0001) was observed at discharge compared to at admission. Improvements for the DBWS group were significantly greater than the SOC group as evidenced by higher gains in total FIM (p = 0.04) and this corresponded to a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.58). Among FIM subscores, the DBWS group achieved a significant increase in sphincter control while all other subscore changes remained non-significant.
Conclusions
This preliminary evidence supports the benefit of using DBWS during inpatient rehabilitation in individuals who have experienced an acute ischemic stroke. This may be due to the greater intensity and repetitions of tasks allowed by DBWS. These preliminary findings warrant further investigations on the use of DBWS in inpatient settings.
Funder
Cardinal Hill Rehabilitation Hospital Endowed Chair in Stroke and Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Rehabilitation
Reference44 articles.
1. Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141(9):e139–596.
2. Gehefer GO, White BM, Simpson KN. Admissions for ischemic stroke among younger adults in Kentucky: a comparison of Appalachian and non-Appalachian Counties. J Allied Health. 2019;48(2):e61–4.
3. Sergeev AV. Stroke mortality disparities in the population of the Appalachian Mountain region. Ethn Dis. 2013;23(3):286–91.
4. Dobkin BH. Neuroplasticity. Key to recovery after central nervous system injury. West J Med. 1993;159(1):56–60.
5. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296(17):2095–104.