Author:
Liukkonen Martta,Hukkanen Mikaela,Cossin-Sevrin Nina,Stier Antoine,Vesterinen Eero,Grond Kirsten,Ruuskanen Suvi
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe gut microbiome forms at an early stage, yet data on the environmental factors influencing the development of wild avian microbiomes is limited. As the gut microbiome is a vital part of organismal health, it is important to understand how it may connect to host performance. The early studies with wild gut microbiome have shown that the rearing environment may be of importance in gut microbiome formation, yet the results vary across taxa, and the effects of specific environmental factors have not been characterized. Here, wild great tit (Parus major) broods were manipulated to either reduce or enlarge the original brood soon after hatching. We investigated if brood size was associated with nestling bacterial gut microbiome, and whether gut microbiome diversity predicted survival. Fecal samples were collected at mid-nestling stage and sequenced with the 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and nestling growth and survival were measured.ResultsGut microbiome diversity showed high variation between individuals, but this variation was not significantly explained by brood size or body mass. Additionally, we did not find a significant effect of brood size on body mass or gut microbiome composition. We also demonstrated that early handling had no impact on nestling performance or gut microbiome. Furthermore, we found no significant association between gut microbiome diversity and short-term (survival to fledging) or mid-term (apparent juvenile) survival.ConclusionsWe found no clear association between early-life environment, offspring condition and gut microbiome. This suggests that brood size is not a significantly contributing factor to great tit nestling condition, and that other environmental and genetic factors may be more strongly linked to offspring condition and gut microbiome. Future studies should expand into other early-life environmental factors e.g., diet composition and quality, and parental influences.
Funder
Emil Aaltosen Säätiö
Opetushallitus
HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Turku Collegium for Science and Medicine
University of Jyväskylä
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference132 articles.
1. Kinross JM, Darzi AW, Nicholson JK. Gut microbiome-host interactions in health and disease. Genome Med. 2011;3(3):1–12.
2. van Dongen WF, White J, Brandl HB, Moodley Y, Merkling T, Leclaire S, Wagner RH. Age-related differences in the cloacal microbiota of a wild bird species. BMC Ecol. 2013;2013(13):1–12.
3. David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505(7484):559–63.
4. Sánchez B, Delgado S, Blanco-Míguez A, Lourenço A, Gueimonde M, Margolles A. Probiotics, gut microbiota, and their influence on host health and disease. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61(1):1600240.
5. Heintz-Buschart A, Wilmes P. Human gut microbiome: function matters. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26(7):563–74.