Abstract
Abstract
Background
The EuroQol Group recently developed two new instruments, the EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB) and the EQ Health and Wellbeing short version (EQ-HWB-S). The EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S are intended to capture a broad range of health and broader quality of life aspects, which may be relevant to general public members, patients, their families, social care users and informal carers. This study assesses the content validity of the Italian version of the two instruments in a sample of Italian patients, social care users and informal carers.
Methods
Participants were recruited using a convenience sampling approach. One-on-one interviews were carried out using video-conferencing interviews. A semi-structured topic guide was used to guide the interview procedures, with open-ended questions supplemented by probes. Participants were asked to explain important aspects of their health and quality of life, to complete the questionnaires and verbalize their thoughts.
Results
Twenty participants comprising of patients (n = 9), informal carers (n = 6), and members of the general public (n = 5) participated to the study. Content validity was summarized into six main themes: comprehension, interpretation, acceptability, relevance, response options and recall period. All participants found the instruments easy or quite easy to understand and to respond to. Items were relevant for all three groups of participants, and response options appropriate.
Conclusions
The Italian version of the EQ-HWB showed content validity in measuring health and wellbeing in a mixed Italian population.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Karimi M, Brazier J (2016) Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: what is the difference? PharmacoEconomics 7(34):645–649
2. Brazier J, Ara R, Rowen D, Chevrou-Severac H (2017) A review of generic preference-based mesures for use in cost-effectiveness models. PharmacoEconomics
3. Drummond M, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Stoddart G, Torrance G (2015) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press, Oxford
4. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A (2011) Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 20:1727–1736
5. Devlin N, Shah K, Feng Y, Mulhern B, van Hout B (2018) Valuing health-related quality of life: an EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ 27(1):7–22
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献