Author:
Zirkle Joel,Han Xiaomei,Racz Rebecca,Samieegohar Mohammadreza,Chaturbedi Anik,Mann John,Chakravartula Shilpa,Li Zhihua
Abstract
Abstract
Background
During drug development, it is essential to gather information about the change of clinical exposure of a drug (object) due to the pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with another drug (precipitant). While many natural language processing (NLP) methods for DDI have been published, most were designed to evaluate if (and what kind of) DDI relationships exist in the text, without identifying the direction of DDI (object vs. precipitant drug). Here we present a method for the automatic identification of the directionality of a PK DDI from literature or drug labels.
Methods
We reannotated the Text Analysis Conference (TAC) DDI track 2019 corpus for identifying the direction of a PK DDI and evaluated the performance of a fine-tuned BioBERT model on this task by following the training and validation steps prespecified by TAC.
Results
This initial attempt showed the model achieved an F-score of 0.82 in identifying sentences as containing PK DDI and an F-score of 0.97 in identifying object versus precipitant drugs in those sentences.
Discussion and conclusion
Despite a growing list of NLP methods for DDI extraction, most of them use a common set of corpora to perform general purpose tasks (e.g., classifying a sentence into one of several fixed DDI categories). There is a lack of coordination between the drug development and biomedical informatics method development community to develop corpora and methods to perform specific tasks (e.g., extract clinical exposure changes due to PK DDI). We hope that our effort can encourage such a coordination so that more “fit for purpose” NLP methods could be developed and used to facilitate the drug development process.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry,Structural Biology
Reference21 articles.
1. Herrero-Zazo M, et al. The DDI corpus: an annotated corpus with pharmacological substances and drug–drug interactions. J Biomed Inform. 2013;46(5):914–20.
2. Zhu Y, et al. Extracting drug-drug interactions from texts with BioBERT and multiple entity-aware attentions. J Biomed Inform. 2020;106: 103451.
3. Hefner G, et al. Prevalence and sort of pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions in hospitalized psychiatric patients. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2020;127(8):1185–98.
4. Harmonisation, I.C.f. ICH E14/S7B Clinical and Nonclinical Evaluation of QT/QTc Interval Prolongation and Proarrhythmic Potential Questions and Answers 2022 3/1/2023]; Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/e14-and-s7b-clinical-and-nonclinical-evaluation-qtqtc-interval-prolongation-and-proarrhythmic.
5. Segura-Bedmar I, Martinez P, Sanchez-Cisneros D. The 1st DDIExtraction-2011 challenge task: extraction of drug–drug interactions from biomedical texts. 2011;2011:1–9.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献