Author:
Oliver Matthieu,Allou Nicolas,Devineau Marjolaine,Allyn Jèrôme,Ferdynus Cyril
Abstract
Abstract
Backgroud
Modelling discrete-time cause-specific hazards in the presence of competing events and non-proportional hazards is a challenging task in many domains. Survival analysis in longitudinal cohorts often requires such models; notably when the data is gathered at discrete points in time and the predicted events display complex dynamics. Current models often rely on strong assumptions of proportional hazards, that is rarely verified in practice; or do not handle sequential data in a meaningful way. This study proposes a Transformer architecture for the prediction of cause-specific hazards in discrete-time competing risks. Contrary to Multilayer perceptrons that were already used for this task (DeepHit), the Transformer architecture is especially suited for handling complex relationships in sequential data, having displayed state-of-the-art performance in numerous tasks with few underlying assumptions on the task at hand.
Results
Using synthetic datasets of 2000–50,000 patients, we showed that our Transformer model surpassed the CoxPH, PyDTS, and DeepHit models for the prediction of cause-specific hazard, especially when the proportional assumption did not hold. The error along simulated time outlined the ability of our model to anticipate the evolution of cause-specific hazards at later time steps where few events are observed. It was also superior to current models for prediction of dementia and other psychiatric conditions in the English longitudinal study of ageing cohort using the integrated brier score and the time-dependent concordance index. We also displayed the explainability of our model’s prediction using the integrated gradients method.
Conclusions
Our model provided state-of-the-art prediction of cause-specific hazards, without adopting prior parametric assumptions on the hazard rates. It outperformed other models in non-proportional hazards settings for both the synthetic dataset and the longitudinal cohort study. We also observed that basic models such as CoxPH were more suited to extremely simple settings than deep learning models. Our model is therefore especially suited for survival analysis on longitudinal cohorts with complex dynamics of the covariate-to-outcome relationship, which are common in clinical practice. The integrated gradients provided the importance scores of input variables, which indicated variables guiding the model in its prediction. This model is ready to be utilized for time-to-event prediction in longitudinal cohorts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Routh P, Roy A, Meyer J. Estimating customer churn under competing risks. J Oper Res Soc. 2020;72(1–18):08.
2. Wycinka E. Competing risk models of default in the presence of early repayments. Econometrics. 2019;23:06.
3. Cope S, Jansen J. Quantitative summaries of treatment effect estimates obtained with network meta-analysis of survival curves to inform decision-making. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(147):12.
4. Lee M, Feuer EJ, Fine JP. On the analysis of discrete time competing risks data. Biometrics. 2018;74(4):1468–81.
5. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1972;34(2):187–202.