Cardiac magnetic resonance parameters associated with successful conversion from a single ventricular to a one-and-a-half or biventricular circulation in patients with a hypoplastic right ventricle

Abstract

Abstract Background Some patients with pulmonary atresia with an intact ventricular septum (PA/IVS) or a left ventricle dominant atrioventricular canal defect (LDAVC) with a hypoplastic right ventricle (RV) and univentricular (1 V) circulation may be candidates for conversion to either a complete biventricular (2 V) repair or a one-and-a-half ventricle repair (1.5 V). We sought to identify pre-operative cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) findings associated with successful conversion from 1V to 1.5V or 2V circulation. Methods In this single center retrospective study, subjects with PA/IVS or LDAVC and no conotruncal abnormalities were included if they had a 1 V circulation at the time of CMR followed by a surgical intervention intended to convert them to a 1.5 V or 2 V circulation. Conversion failure was defined as any of the following: (1) oxygen saturation < 90% at the most recent follow-up, (2) conversion back to a 1.5 V or 1 V circulation, or (3) death. Results In the PA/IVS cohort (n = 15, median age 1.32 years), 10 patients underwent surgical conversion to a 1.5 V circulation and 5 to a 2 V circulation. In the attempted 1.5 V group, there were 2 failures, and these cases had a lower RV mass (p = 0.04). In the attempted 2 V group, there was 1 failure, and no CMR parameters were significantly different compared to the successes. Among the successful 2 V group patients, the minimum RV end-diastolic volume (EDV) was 27 ml/m2. In the LDAVC cohort (n = 15, median age 1.0 years), 1 patient underwent surgical conversion to a 1.5 V circulation and 14 patients to a 2 V circulation. In the attempted 1.5 V group, the 1 conversion was a failure and had an RV EDV of 15 ml/m2. In the attempted 2 V group, there were 2 failures, and these cases had a smaller RV:LV stroke volume ratio (p = 0.05) and a lower RV ejection fraction (p = 0.05) compared to the successes. Among the successful 2 V group patients, the minimum RV EDV was 22 ml/m2. Conclusions We identified multiple CMR parameters associated with successful conversion from 1 V circulation to 1.5 V or 2 V circulation in patients with PA/IVS and LDAVC. This information may improve patient selection for conversion procedures and encourage larger studies to better define the role of CMR.