Abstract
Abstract
Background
Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is a valuable part of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). In particular, inversion-recovery imaging of LGE, with nulling of the signal from reference areas of myocardium, can have a distinctive pattern in some patients with cardiac amyloid, including both diffuse (relatively faint) subendocardial LGE and a relatively dark appearance of the blood. However, the underlying reasons for this distinctive appearance have not previously been well investigated. Pharmacokinetic modeling of myocardial contrast enhancement kinetics can potentially provide insight into the mechanisms of the distinctive LGE appearance that can be seen in cardiac amyloid, as well as why it may be unreliable in some patients.
Methods
An interactive three-compartment pharmacokinetic model of the dynamics of myocardial contrast enhancement in CMR was implemented, and used to simulate LGE dynamics in normal, scar, and cardiac amyloid myocardium; the results were compared with previously published values.
Results
The three-compartment model is able to capture the qualitative features of LGE, in patients with cardiac amyloid. In particular, the characteristic “dark blood” appearance of PSIR images of LGE in cardiac amyloid is seen to likely primarily reflect expansion of the extravascular extracellular space (EES) by amyloid in the “reference” myocardium; the cardiac amyloid contrast enhancement dynamics also reflect expansion of the body EES.
Conclusion
The distinctive appearance of LGE in cardiac amyloid is likely due to a combination of diffuse expansion by amyloid of the EES of the reference myocardium and of the body EES.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Reference32 articles.
1. Maceira AM, Joshi J, Prasad SK, Moon JC, Perugini E, Harding I, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation. 2005;111(2):186–93. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000152819.97857.9D.
2. Novikov DS, Kiselev VG, Jespersen SN. On modeling. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79(6):3172–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27101.
3. Hamming RW. Numerical methods for scientists and engineers. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1973.
4. Graham MM. Physiologic smoothing of blood time-activity curves for PET data analysis. J Nucl Med. 1997;38(7):1161–8.
5. Moran GR, Thornhill RE, Sykes J, Prato FS. Myocardial viability imaging using Gd-DTPA: physiological modeling of infarcted myocardium, and impact on injection strategy and imaging time. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48(5):791–800. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10289.