Author:
Komatsu Keiji,Matsuura Takanori,Cheng James,Kido Daisuke,Park Wonhee,Ogawa Takahiro
Abstract
AbstractDental implant therapy, established as standard-of-care nearly three decades ago with the advent of microrough titanium surfaces, revolutionized clinical outcomes through enhanced osseointegration. However, despite this pivotal advancement, challenges persist, including prolonged healing times, restricted clinical indications, plateauing success rates, and a notable incidence of peri-implantitis. This review explores the biological merits and constraints of microrough surfaces and evaluates the current landscape of nanofeatured dental implant surfaces, aiming to illuminate strategies for addressing existing impediments in implant therapy. Currently available nanofeatured dental implants incorporated nano-structures onto their predecessor microrough surfaces. While nanofeature integration into microrough surfaces demonstrates potential for enhancing early-stage osseointegration, it falls short of surpassing its predecessors in terms of osseointegration capacity. This discrepancy may be attributed, in part, to the inherent “dichotomy kinetics” of osteoblasts, wherein increased surface roughness by nanofeatures enhances osteoblast differentiation but concomitantly impedes cell attachment and proliferation. We also showcase a controllable, hybrid micro-nano titanium model surface and contrast it with commercially-available nanofeatured surfaces. Unlike the commercial nanofeatured surfaces, the controllable micro-nano hybrid surface exhibits superior potential for enhancing both cell differentiation and proliferation. Hence, present nanofeatured dental implants represent an evolutionary step from conventional microrough implants, yet they presently lack transformative capacity to surmount existing limitations. Further research and development endeavors are imperative to devise optimized surfaces rooted in fundamental science, thereby propelling technological progress in the field.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference235 articles.
1. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81–100.
2. Hori N, Att W, Ueno T, Sato N, Yamada M, Saruwatari L, et al. Age-dependent degradation of the protein adsorption capacity of titanium. J Dent Res. 2009;88(7):663–7.
3. Hori N, Ueno T, Minamikawa H, Iwasa F, Yoshino F, Kimoto K, et al. Electrostatic control of protein adsorption on UV-photofunctionalized titanium. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(10):4175–80.
4. Kitajima H, Hirota M, Iwai T, Mitsudo K, Saruta J, Ogawa T. Synergistic enhancement of protein recruitment and retention via implant surface microtopography and superhydrophilicity in a computational fluid dynamics model. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:15618.
5. Kitajima H, Hirota M, Osawa K, Iwai T, Mitsudo K, Saruta J et al. The effects of a biomimetic hybrid meso- and nano-scale surface topography on blood and protein recruitment in a computational fluid dynamics implant model. Biomimetics (Basel). 2023;8(4).