Abstract
AbstractThe impact of students' intrinsic or extrinsic motivations on their future intentions for online language schooling has been widely documented, but further emphasis needs to be placed on examining motivation beyond traditional theories. Thus, the current study sought to pivot the focus from intrinsic and extrinsic motivation to university language learners’ L2 self-identities in shaping their intention to learn language online. Toward this, we extended the technology acceptance model by integrating language learners’ L2 motivational self-system (L2MSS). Accordingly, 422 Iranian territory students who learned language online completed surveys covering language motivation and attitudes toward online language learning. The results of partial least squares structural equation modeling validated that current L2-self and digital self-authenticity can be used as separable subcomponents of L2MSS in the Iranian territory context. Moreover, learners with a higher level of future self-image and current L2 self-description found online learning more useful and easy to use. A further finding revealed an authenticity gap among higher educators since they were more motivated to learn language online than in face-to-face classrooms. Besides introducing a new conceptual framework into the literature, the researchers suggest that as a way of influencing higher education language learners’ intentions towards online language learning, lecturers should uncover language learners’ future ideal selves in advance of attending this online language course and design their language syllabus accordingly. It is also imperative for instructors to encourage students to self-describe their progress during online courses as it influenced their behavioral intention to learn languages online.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall.
2. Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2018). The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(4), 721–754. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.4.2
3. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2006). Introduction to research in education. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
4. Atif, A., Richards, D., Busch, P., & Bilgin, A. (2015). Assuring graduate competency: A technology acceptance model for course guide tools. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(2), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9095-4
5. Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press.