Author:
Fekih-Romdhane Feten,Dabbous Mariam,Hallit Rabih,Malaeb Diana,Sawma Toni,Obeid Sahar,Hallit Souheil
Abstract
Abstract
Background
All available scales to screen for child abuse may be challenging to administer due to their length. Indeed, a higher number of items is associated with more administration time and less motivation to engage in responding. We aimed through this study to examine the psychometric properties of a brief Arabic version of the Child Abuse Self Report Scale (CASRS-12) in terms of factorial structure, internal consistency, divergent validity, and correlations with measures of bullying victimization, eating attitudes and perceived social support.
Methods
We performed a cross-sectional, web-based study among Community Lebanese adolescents; where two samples have been used (Sample 1: N = 852, aged 15.34 ± 1.18 years, 54.8% females; Sample 2: N = 404, aged 16.60 ± 1.51 years, 57.2% females). The construct validity was tested using both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
Results
Results revealed that both EFA and CFA yielded a four-factor structure for the CASRS-12 that mirrors the original four factors captured by the original CASRS. The scale also showed a good internal consistency as evidenced through McDonald’s ω values ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 for the four subscales; and configural, metric, and scalar invariance across gender. Finally, we found that all CASRS-12 dimensions were significantly and positively correlated with more inappropriate eating attitudes and lower social support; and that psychological, physical, and sexual abuse correlated with higher bullying victimization
Conclusion
In light of these findings, we potentially encourage clinicians and researchers to use this scale as a valid and reliable measure of child abuse among Arabic-speaking populations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference72 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Child Maltreatment. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/child-maltreatment.
2. Gonzalez D, Bethencourt Mirabal A, McCall JD. Child Abuse and Neglect. [Updated 2022 Jul 4]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459146/.
3. Hillis S, Mercy J, Amobi A, Kress H. Global prevalence of past-year violence against children: a systematic review and minimum estimates. Pediatrics. 2016;137(3):e20154079. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-4079.
4. Widom CS. Longterm consequences of child maltreatment. In: Handbook of child maltreatment. Cham: Springer, NY, USA; 2014. p. 225–47.
5. Ferrara P, Guadagno C, Sbordone A, Amato M, Spina G, Perrone G, Cutrona C, Basile M, Ianniello F, Fabrizio GC. Child abuse and neglect and its psycho-physical and social consequences: a review of the literature. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2016;12(4):301–10.