Training approaches for the dissemination of clinical guidelines for NSSI: a quasi-experimental trial

Author:

Koenig Elisa,Hoffmann Ulrike,Fegert Jörg M.,Keller Ferdinand,Sicorello Maurizio,Spohrs Jennifer,Kraus Laura,Nickel Sandra,Schmahl Christian,Abler Birgit,In-Albon Tina,Koenig Julian,Ougrin Dennis,Kaess Michael,Plener Paul L., ,Sittenberger Elisa,Schischke Lisa,Geprägs Alina,Liebhart Isabell,Witt Andreas,Sachser Cedric,Brown Rebecca,Münch Vera,König Elisa,Niedtfeld Inga,Zähringer Jenny,Isik Hasan-Hüseyin,Koelch Michael,Reis Olaf,Michelsen Anna,Chiocchetti Andreas G.,Lindlar Silvia,Waltes Regina,Mössner Markus,van der Venne Patrice,Höper Saskia,Flach Elisa,Edinger Alexandra,Bauer Stephanie,Mattern Margarete,Herpertz Sabine,Ebner Ulrich,Santangelo Philip S.

Abstract

Abstract Background Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is of high clinical relevance due to its high prevalence and negative long-term implications. In 2016, the German consensus-based clinical guidelines for diagnostic, assessment and treatment of NSSI in childhood and adolescence were published. However, research indicates that clinical guidelines are often poorly implemented in clinical practice. One crucial part of this process is the training of healthcare professionals to transfer knowledge and capacities to bring guideline recommendations into clinical practice. Methods The effect of three different dissemination strategies (printed educational material, e-learning, and blended-learning) on the NSSI guidelines´ recommendations was examined among 671 physicians and psychotherapists via an online-survey. The quasi-experimental study included three measurement points (before the training, after the training, 3-month follow-up) and mixed effects models were used to test for changes in knowledge, competences and attitudes toward NSSI and treatment. Moreover, the transfer of gained competences to practical work and user satisfaction were reviewed. Results With all three training formats, the intended changes of the outcome variables could be observed. Hereby, the printed educational material condition showed the lowest improvement in the scores for the ‘negative attitudes toward NSSI and those who self-injure’. The training effect remained stable throughout the follow-up measurement. The highest application rate of acquired intervention techniques in clinical practice was reported for the blended-learning condition. For all three training strategies, user satisfaction was high and evaluation of training quality was positive, with printed educational material receiving the lowest and blended-learning the highest evaluations. Conclusions In summary, all three training formats were perceived to be of high quality and seem to be suited to cover the needs of a heterogeneous group of physicians and psychotherapists. The choice of training method could be driven by considering which training goals are desired to be achieved and by the benefit-cost ratio allowing for tailored training approaches.

Funder

Universitätsklinikum Ulm

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3