Author:
Enzing Joost J.,Knies Saskia,Engel Jop,IJzerman Maarten J.,Sander Beate,Vreman Rick,Boer Bert,Brouwer Werner B. F.
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Drug reimbursement decisions are often made based on a price set by the manufacturer. In some cases, this price leads to public and scientific debates about whether its level can be justified in relation to its costs, including those related to research and development (R&D) and manufacturing. Such considerations could enter the decision process in collectively financed health care systems. This paper investigates whether manufacturers’ costs in relation to drug prices, or profit margins, are explicitly mentioned and considered by health technology assessment (HTA) organisations.
Method
An analysis of reimbursement reports for cancer drugs was performed. All relevant Dutch HTA-reports, published between 2017 and 2019, were selected and matched with HTA-reports from three other jurisdictions (England, Canada, Australia). Information was extracted. Additionally, reimbursement reports for three cases of expensive non-oncolytic orphan drugs prominent in pricing debates in the Netherlands were investigated in depth to examine consideration of profit margins.
Results
A total of 66 HTA-reports concerning 15 cancer drugs were included. None of these reports contained information on manufacturer’s costs or profit margins. Some reports contained general considerations of the HTA organisation which related prices to manufacturers’ costs: six contained a statement on the lack of price setting transparency, one mentioned recouping R&D costs as a potential argument to justify a high price. For the case studies, 21 HTA-reports were selected. One contained a cost-based price justification provided by the manufacturer. None of the other reports contained information on manufacturer’s costs or profit margins. Six reports contained a discussion about lack of transparency. Reports from two jurisdictions contained invitations to justify high prices by demonstrating high costs.
Conclusion
Despite the attention given to manufacturers’ costs in relation to price in public debates and in the literature, this issue does not seem to get explicit systematic consideration in the reimbursement reports of expensive drugs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Gronde TV, Uyl-de Groot CA, Pieters T. . Addressing the challenge of high-priced prescription drugs in the era of precision medicine: a systematic review of drug life cycles, therapeutic drug markets and regulatory frameworks. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):e0182613.
2. House-of-Commons. Health and Social Care Committee Oral evidence: availability of Orkambi on the NHS, HC 18082019. http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/health-and-social-care-committee/availability-of-orkambi-on-the-nhs/oral/97783.html
3. WHO. WHO guideline on country pharmaceutical pricing policies, 2nd edition. 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1309649/retrieve.
4. eunethta. HTA Core Model® Version 3.0. 2016. http://www.corehta.info/model/HTACoreModel3.0.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2020.
5. Goetghebeur MM, Wagner M, Khoury H, Levitt RJ, Erickson LJ, Rindress D. Evidence and value: impact on DEcision Making—the EVIDEM framework and potential applications. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:270.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献