EU surveys insights: analytical tools, future directions, and the essential requirement for reference materials in wastewater monitoring of SARS-CoV-2, antimicrobial resistance and beyond
-
Published:2024-06-27
Issue:1
Volume:18
Page:
-
ISSN:1479-7364
-
Container-title:Human Genomics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Hum Genomics
Author:
Paracchini Valentina,Petrillo Mauro,Arcot Rajashekar Anandasagari,Robuch Piotr,Vincent Ursula,Corbisier Philippe,Tavazzi Simona,Raffael Barbara,Suffredini Elisabetta,La Rosa Giuseppina,Gawlik Bernd Manfred,Marchini Antonio
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Wastewater surveillance (WWS) acts as a vigilant sentinel system for communities, analysing sewage to protect public health by detecting outbreaks and monitoring trends in pathogens and contaminants. To achieve a thorough comprehension of present and upcoming practices and to identify challenges and opportunities for standardisation and improvement in WWS methodologies, two EU surveys were conducted targeting over 750 WWS laboratories across Europe and other regions. The first survey explored a diverse range of activities currently undertaken or planned by laboratories. The second survey specifically targeted methods and quality controls utilised for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance.
Results
The findings of the two surveys provide a comprehensive insight into the procedures and methodologies applied in WWS. In Europe, WWS primarily focuses on SARS-CoV-2 with 99% of the survey participants dedicated to this virus. However, the responses highlighted a lack of standardisation in the methodologies employed for monitoring SARS-CoV-2. The surveillance of other pathogens, including antimicrobial resistance, is currently fragmented and conducted by only a limited number of laboratories. Notably, these activities are anticipated to expand in the future. Survey replies emphasise the collective recognition of the need to enhance the accuracy of results in WWS practices, reflecting a shared commitment to advancing precision and effectiveness in WWS methodologies.
Conclusions
These surveys identified a lack of standardised common procedures in WWS practices and the need for quality standards and reference materials to enhance the accuracy and reliability of WWS methods in the future. In addition, it is important to broaden surveillance efforts beyond SARS-CoV-2 to include other emerging pathogens and antimicrobial resistance to ensure a comprehensive approach to protecting public health.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Choi PM, Tscharke BJ, Donner E, O’Brien JW, Grant SC, Kaserzon SL, Mackie R, O’Malley E, Crosbie ND, Thomas KV, et al. Wastewater-based epidemiology biomarkers: past, present and future. TRAC Trends Anal Chem. 2018;105:453–69. 2. Schmidt C. Watcher in the wastewater. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(8):917–20. 3. Hassoun-Kheir N, Stabholz Y, Kreft JU, de la Cruz R, Romalde JL, Nesme J, Sørensen SJ, Smets BF, Graham D, Paul M. Comparison of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes abundance in hospital and community wastewater: a systematic review. Sci Total Environ. 2020;743:140804. 4. Bowes DA, Darling A, Driver EM, Kaya D, Maal-Bared R, Lee LM, Goodman K, Adhikari S, Aggarwal S, Bivins A, et al. Structured ethical review for Wastewater-based testing in support of Public Health. Environ Sci Technol. 2023;57(35):12969–80. 5. Ahmed W, Angel N, Edson J, Bibby K, Bivins A, O’Brien JW, Choi PM, Kitajima M, Simpson SL, Li J, et al. First confirmed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in untreated wastewater in Australia: A proof of concept for the wastewater surveillance of COVID-19 in the community. Sci Total Environ. 2020;728:138764.
|
|