Pattern and trends of the total and age-specific fertility rates during 1990–2018 in Pakistan

Author:

Naz LubnaORCID,Kamal Asifa,Kamran Adan,Trueha Kassahun

Abstract

Abstract Background Pakistan has an inadequate vital event registration system, leading to fewer than half of all births being registered, and this issue is further exacerbated by systematic recall errors and omission of births. This study aims to evaluate direct and indirect methods of fertility estimation to analyze the trends and patterns of fertility rates in Pakistan from 1990 to 2018. Design/methodology/approach Indirect methods are utilized in this study to evaluate the direction and extent of changes in total and age-specific fertility rates, and these findings are compared to direct estimates. The study draws data on livebirths from four waves of the Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey that took place between 1990 and 2018. To ensure the quality of data, graphical methods and Whipple and Myers indices are employed. Additionally, the Brass Relational Gompertz model was used to analyze the data. Results The Relational Gompertz model revealed that total fertility rates (TFRs) were higher than direct estimates by 0.4 children and age-specific fertility rates (ASFR) were higher for all age groups except the oldest. The difference was more significant among younger women aged 15–24, and less so for age groups 29 and above. The gap in estimated fertility between direct and indirect methods decreased with age. Conclusion The indirect method is an invaluable tool in situations where direct measurement of fertility rates is challenging or impossible. By utilizing this method, policymakers can gain important insights into the fertility patterns and trends of a population, which is crucial for making informed decisions on fertility planning.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. National Institute of Population Studies ICF. Pakistan Demographic Health Survey (PDHS) 2017–18 (Main Report).

2. Ali SM, Hussain J, Chaduary AM. Fertility transition in pakistan: evidence from census. Pak Dev Rev. 2001;40:537–50.

3. Alam I, Irfan M, Farooqui NI. Fertility levels, trends and differentials in Pakistan: evidence from the population,labour force and migration survey 179-80. Pakistan institute of development economics; 1983. https://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PLMReports/PLM-1.pdf.

4. Sathar ZA. Stagnation in fertility levels in Pakistan. Asia-Pacific Popul J. 2007;22:113–31.

5. Gaisie S. Fertility trend in Ghana. African Popul Stud. 2005;20:1–24.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3