Author:
Obasi Chidi,Agwu Allison,Akinpelu Wale,Hammons Roger,Clark Clyde,Etienne-cummings Ralph,Hill Peter,Rothman Richard,Babalola Stella,Ross Tracy,Carroll Karen,Asiyanbola Bolanle
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite standard manual decontamination, hospital equipment remains contaminated with microorganisms, contributing to nosocomial transmission and hospital acquired infections. This has the potential to negate the effects of healthcare workers' hand-washing protocols. In order to decrease the likihood of equipment contamination, there has been a rise in the use of disposable pieces of equipment, especially non-critical disposables. However, these carry a significant cost, both a direct financial cost (running into billions of dollars), as well as a cost to the environment. This is important because we hope to contain the cost of healthcare, one way to do that, is to look to the hospitals themselves, for innovative solutions that maintain the standard of care.
Objective
To develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an simple decontamination device for use with portable hospital equipment, by comparing rates of residual contamination after use of the novel device versus those seen with standard manual decontamination methods.
Methods
The Self-cleaning Unit for the Decontamination of Small instruments (SUDS) is a user-friendly, automated instrument developed via multi-disciplinary collaboration for decontamination in the clinical area. Pre- and post- utilization of portable medical equipment in an emergency department (ED) setting were cultured. To evaluate durability of the decrease in antimicrobial contamination, objects were re-cultured 48 hours after SUDS cleaning and following re-introduction into the clinical setting.
Results
After manual decontamination, 25% (23/91) of the tested objects in the ED were found to be culture positive with clinically significant microorganisms(CSO). Fifteen percent (ED) of non-critical equipment tested had multiple organisms. Following the use of SUDS, the colonization rate decreased to 0%. Following SUDS treatment and re-introduction into the clinical settings, after 48 hours the contamination rates as reflected by the cultures remained 0%.
Conclusion
Standard non-critical equipment is contaminated with clinically significant microorganisms. The SUDS device allows for effective and durable decontamination of hospital equipment of varying sizes in the clinical area without disrupting patient care.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Nellcor Compatible Disposable Pulse Oximetry Sensor for Adults
[http://formosa-enterprises-llc.amazonwebstore.com/Nellcor-Compatible-Disposable-Pulse-Oximetry-Sensor/M/B001EZN0O8.htm?traffic_src=froogle&utm_medium=organic&utm_source=froogle]
2. Madan AK: "Blood-soaked blood pressure cuff.".
AHRQ WebM&M; 2003. [http://www.webmm.ahrq.gov/case.aspx?caseID=12]
3. Spaulding EH: Chemical disinfection of medical and surgical materials. In Disinfection Sterilization and Preservation. Edited by: Lawrence CA, Block SS. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; 1968:517–531.
4. Rutala WA: Disinfection and sterilization of patient-care items. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996, 17: 377–84.
5. Favero MS, Bond WW: Chemical disinfection of medical and surgical materials. In Disinfection, sterilization, and preservation. 4th edition. Edited by: Block SS. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1991:617–641.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献