Factors that influence evidence-informed meso-level regional primary health care planning: a qualitative examination and conceptual framework

Author:

Windle AliceORCID,Javanparast Sara,Freeman Toby,Baum Fran

Abstract

Abstract Background Evidence-informed primary health care (PHC) planning in decentralised, meso-level regional organisations has received little research attention. In this paper we examine the factors that influence planning within this environment, and present a conceptual framework. Methods We employed mixed methods: case studies of five Australian Primary Health Networks (PHNs), involving 29 primary interviews and secondary analysis of 38 prior interviews; and analysis of planning documents from all 31 PHNs. The analysis was informed by a WHO framework of evidence-informed policy-making, and institutional theory. Results Influential actors included federal and state/territory governments, Local Health Networks, Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations, local councils, public hospitals, community health services, and providers of allied health, mental health and aged care services. The federal government was most influential, constraining PHNs’ planning scope, time and funding. Other external factors included: the health service landscape; local socio-demographic and geographic characteristics; (neoliberal) ideology; interests and politics; national policy settings and reforms; and system reorganisation. Internal factors included: organisational structure; culture, values and ideology; various capacity factors; planning processes; transition history; and experience. The additional regional layer of context adds to the complexity of planning. Conclusions Like national health policy-making, meso-level PHC planning occurs in a complex environment, but with additional regional factors and influences. We have developed a conceptual framework of the meso-level PHC planning environment, which can be employed by similar regional organisations to elucidate influential factors, and develop strategies and tools to promote transparent, evidence-informed PHC planning for better health outcomes.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference48 articles.

1. Naylor C, Curry N, Holder H, Ross S, Marshall L, Tait E. Clinical commissioning groups: supporting improvement in general practice? The King's Fund and Nuffield Trust; 2013.

2. Auwal S, Kaur K, Salma A, Kay T, Kamal A, Ismail S, et al. Countries experiences: review of district health management in developing and low developing countries. Int J Public Health Clin Sci. 2016;3(2):31–45.

3. Freeman T, Baum F, Javanparast S, Ziersch A, Mackean T, Windle A. Challenges facing primary health care in federated government systems: implementation of primary health networks in Australian states and territories. Health Policy. 2021;125:495–503.

4. World Health Organization. Alma Ata Declaration. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1978.

5. Green A, Bennett S. Sound choices: enhancing capacity for evidence-informed health policy: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3