Abstract
AbstractInfusion of fluids is one of the most common medical acts when resuscitating critically ill patients. However, fluids most often are given without consideration of how fluid infusion can actually improve tissue perfusion. Arthur Guyton’s analysis of the circulation was based on how cardiac output is determined by the interaction of the factors determining the return of blood to the heart, i.e. venous return, and the factors that determine the output from the heart, i.e. pump function. His theoretical approach can be used to understand what fluids can and cannot do. In his graphical analysis, right atrial pressure (RAP) is at the center of this interaction and thus indicates the status of these two functions. Accordingly, trends in RAP and cardiac output (or a surrogate of cardiac output) can provide important guides for the cause of a hemodynamic deterioration, the potential role of fluids, the limits of their use, and when the fluid is given, the response to therapeutic interventions. Use of the trends in these values provide a physiologically grounded approach to clinical fluid management.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Magder S. An Approach to hemodynamic monitoring: Guyton at the beside. Crit Care. 2012;16:236–43.
2. Magder S. Right atrial pressure in the critically ill: how to measure, what is the value, what are the limitations. Chest. 2016.
3. Guyton AC, Polizo D, Armstrong GG. Mean circulatory filling pressure measured immediately after cessation of heart pumping. AmJPhysiol. 1954;179(2):261–7.
4. Rothe C. Venous system: physiology of the capacitance vessels. In: Shepherd JT, Abboud FM, editors. Handbook of Physiology. The Cardiovascular System. Section 2. III. Bethesda: American Physiological Society; 1983. pp. 397–452.
5. Magder S, De Varennes B. Clinical death and the measurement of stressed vascular volume. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:1061–4.