Author:
Cai He,Zhang Man,Wang Xin,Cai Yunqiang,Peng Bing
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The use of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (SILPD + 1) has been never reported, and its safety and efficacy remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of SILPD + 1 compared with those of conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (CLPD).
Method
Fifty-seven cases of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) were performed between November 2021, and March 2022. Among them, 10 cases of LPD were performed using a single-incision plus one-port device. Based on the same inclusion and exclusion criteria, 47 cases of LPD performed using traditional 5-trocar were included as a control group. The patient’s demographic characteristics, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed.
Results
Three men and seven women were included in the SILPD + 1 group. All baseline parameters of both groups were comparable, except for age. Patients were younger in the SILPD + 1 group (47.2 ± 18.3 years vs. 60.6 ± 11.7 years, P = 0.05) than that in the CLPD group. Compared with the CLPD group, median operation time (222.5 (208.8–245.0) vs. 305.0 (256.0–37.0) min, P < 0.001) was shorter, median postoperative VAS scores on days 1–3 were lower, and median cosmetic score (21.0 (19.0–23.5) vs. 17.0 (16.0–20.0), P = 0.026) was higher one month after the surgery in the SILPD + 1 group. The estimated blood loss, conversion rate, blood-transfusion rate, exhaust time, time of drainage tube removal, postoperative hospital stays, and perioperative complications were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusion
In a high-volume LPD center, SILPD + 1 is safe and feasible for well-selected patients without increasing the operation time and complications. It even has the advantages of reduced postoperative pain and improved cosmetic results.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994;8(5):408–10.
2. Wang X, Cai Y, Jiang J. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes and experience of 550 patients in a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(11):1–12.
3. Nassour I, Wang SC, Christie A, Augustine MM, Porembka MR, Yopp AC, Choti MA, Mansour JC, Xie XJ, Polanco PM, et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity-matched Study From a National Cohort of Patients. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):151–7.
4. Xu Y, Zhou Y, Lv F, Liu Y, Ji X. Clinical Efficacy of Single-Port Thoracoscopic Lobectomy versus Three-Port Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer. Journal of oncology. 2022;2022:3434430.
5. Lee SR, Kim JH, Lee YJ, Lee SW, Park JY, Suh DS, Kim DY, Kim SH, Kim YM, Kim YT. Single-Incision versus multiport robotic myomectomy: a propensity score matched analysis of surgical outcomes and surgical tips. J Clin Med. 2021;10(17):3957.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献