Author:
Huang Xiaoyi,Huang Wenbin,Pei Tao,Zhao Yijiao,Wang Yong,Gu Yan,Bai Xueqin
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study aims to evaluate the difference of three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed palatal morphology between subjects with skeletal Class III and skeletal Class I in different vertical patterns using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Methods
In this study, 89 subjects with skeletal Class III (49 females, 40 males; 25.45 ± 3.81 years) and 85 subjects with skeletal Class I (45 females, 40 males; 23.95 ± 4.45 years) were collected retrospectively and divided into hyperdivergent, normodivergent and hypodivergent groups. Dolphin software was used to reorient the CBCT images of these subjects. After segmenting 3D object of maxilla from the 3D skull by ProPlan software, Geomagic Studio was used to reconstruct 3D palatal morphology and establish an average 3D palatal morphology for each group. The differences of 3D palatal morphology between different groups were compared by deviation patterns on 3D colored map analysis.
Results
3D colored map analysis showed the posterior part of male’s palate was higher and wider than that of female’s palate in skeletal Class III subjects. In skeletal Class III subjects, males with hyperdivergent pattern had a higher and narrower palate compared with hypodivergent subjects, while females with hyperdivergent had a higher but not obviously narrower palate compared with hypodivergent subjects. In the similar vertical patterns, skeletal Class III subjects had a flatter but not narrower palate compared with skeletal Class I subjects, along with a smaller palate volume.
Conclusions
This method allows more intuitive between-group comparisons of the differences of 3D palatal morphology. In skeletal Class III subjects, as the vertical dimension increased, the palate tends to be higher and narrower. Therefore, the influence of vertical patterns on the palatal morphology should be fully considered in the orthodontic and orthognathic treatment of skeletal Class III subjects.
Funder
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference23 articles.
1. Jena AK, Duggal R. Class-III malocclusion: genetics or environment? A twins study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2005;23(1):27–30.
2. Ellis E 3rd, McNamara JA Jr. Components of adult class III malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984;42(5):295–305.
3. Guyer EC, Ellis EE 3rd, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG. Components of class III maloclussion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod. 1986;56(1):7–30.
4. Li C, Cai Y, Chen S, Chen F. Classification and characterization of class III malocclusion in Chinese individuals. Head Face Med. 2016;12(1):31.
5. Suk KE, Park JH, Bayome M, Nam YO, Sameshima GT, Kook YA. Comparison between dental and basal arch forms in normal occlusion and class III malocclusions utilizing cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod. 2013;43(1):15–22.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献