Clinical activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab, and TMZ in patients with recurrent glioblastoma
-
Published:2024-01-25
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-2407
-
Container-title:BMC Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Cancer
Author:
Lu Yinghao, Liao Limin, Du Kunpeng, Mo Jianhua, Zou Xia, Liang Junxian, Chen Jiahui, Tang Wenwen, Su Liwei, Wu Jieping, Zhang Junde, Tan YujingORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
There are limited and no standard therapies for recurrent glioblastoma. We herein report the antitumour activity and safety of sintilimab, bevacizumab and temozolomide (TMZ) in recurrent glioblastoma.
Methods
We retrospectively analysed eight patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with sintilimab (200 mg) every three weeks + bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every three weeks + TMZ (200 mg/m²orally) (5 days orally every 28 days for a total of four weeks). The primary objective was investigator-assessed median progression-free survival(mPFS). Secondary objectives were to assess the 6-month PFS, objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) accroding to RANO criteria.
Results
The mPFS time for 8 patients was 3.340 months (95% CI: 2.217–4.463), The longest PFS was close to 9 months. Five patients were assessed to have achieved partial response (PR), with an overall remission rate of 62.5%, Four patients experienced a change in tumour volume at the best response time of greater than 60% shrinkage from baseline, and one patient remained progression free upon review, with a DOR of more than 6.57 months. The 6-month PFS was 25% (95% CI: 5.0–55.0%). Three patients had a treatment-related adverse events, though no grade 4 or 5 adverse events occurred.
Conclusion
In this small retrospective study, the combination regimen of sintilimab, bevacizumab and TMZ showed promising antitumour activity in treatment of recurrent glioblastoma, with a good objective remission rate.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China-Guangdong Joint Fund Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO. 2005. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med (2005), 987–996. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330. 2. Clarke JL, Ennis MM, Yung WK, Chang SM, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF, Deangelis LM, Robins HI, Lieberman FS, Fine HA, Abrey L, Gilbert MR, Mehta M, Kuhn JG, Aldape KD, Lamborn KR, Prados MD. 2011. Is surgery at progression a prognostic marker for improved 6-month progression-free survival or overall survival for patients with recurrent glioblastoma? Neuro-Oncology (2011), 1118–1124. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nor110. 3. Lamborn KR, Yung WK, Chang SM, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF, DeAngelis LM, Robins HI, Lieberman FS, Fine HA, Fink KL, Junck L, Abrey L, Gilbert MR, Mehta M, Kuhn JG, Aldape KD, Hibberts J, Peterson PM, Prados MD. Progression-free survival: an important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. Neuro-Oncology (2008). 2008;162–170. https://doi.org/10.1215/15228517-2007-062. 4. Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K, Duic P, Royce C, Stroud I, Garren N, Mackey M, Butman JA, Camphausen K, Park J, Albert PS, Fine HA. 2009. Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol (2009), 740–745. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3055. 5. Desjardins A, Reardon DA, Coan A, Marcello J, Nd Herndon JE, Bailey L, Peters KB, Friedman HS, Vredenburgh JJ. 2012. Bevacizumab and daily temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma. Cancer (2012), 1302–1312. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26381.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|