Understanding women’s and men’s perspectives on cervical cancer screening in Uganda: a qualitative study
-
Published:2024-08-01
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-2407
-
Container-title:BMC Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Cancer
Author:
Bouskill Kathryn,Wagner Glenn J.,Gizaw Mahlet,Matovu Joseph KB,Juncker Margrethe,Namisango Eve,Nakami Sylvia,Beyeza-Kashesya Jolly,Luyirika Emmanuel,Wanyenze Rhoda K.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cervical cancer remains a significant but preventable threat to women’s health throughout much of the developing world, including Uganda. Cervical cancer screening and timely treatment of pre-cancerous lesions is a cost-effective means of mitigating cervical cancer morbidity and mortality. However, only 5% of women in Uganda have ever been screened. Barriers to screening, such as social stigma and access to safe conditions, have been previously identified, but insights into the role of male spouses in encouraging or discouraging screening have been limited. To our knowledge, no studies have compared barriers and facilitators among women who had or had not yet been screened and male partners of screened and unscreened women.
Methods
To resolve this gap, we conducted 7 focus groups– 3 among women who had been screened, 3 among those who had not been screened, and 1 among men whose female partners had or had not been screened. We performed qualitative thematic analysis on the focus group data.
Results
We identified several important factors impacting screening and the decision to screen among women, ranging from stigma, availability of screening, false beliefs around the procedure and side effects, and the role of spousal support in screening promotion. Male spousal perspectives for screening ranged from full support to hesitancy around male-performed exams and possible prolonged periods without intercourse.
Conclusion
This exploratory work demonstrates the importance of dialogue both among women and their male partners in enhancing screening uptake. Efforts to address screening uptake are necessary given that it is an important means of mitigating the burden of cervical cancer. Interventions along these lines need to take these barriers and facilitators into account in order to drive up demand for screening.
Funder
Fogarty International Center
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. African Cancer Registry Network [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Dec 10]. Uganda - Kampala Cancer Registry. http://afcrn.org/membership/membership-list/81-kampala-uganda.
2. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M et al. Cancer today. 2018. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer today. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/.
3. International Agency of Cancer Registries [Internet]. 2018. Kampala Cancer Registry.
4. Wabinga H, Parkin D, Nambooze S. Kampala Cancer Registry report for the period 2007–2009. Kampala, Uganda: Kampala Cancer Registry; 2012.
5. Nakisige C, Schwartz M, Ndira AO. Cervical cancer screening and treatment in Uganda. Gynecologic Oncol Rep. 2017;20:37–40.