Author:
Zhang Meng-ya,Ma Yu-jun,Chen Peng,Shi Fang-zhong,Wei Jun-qi
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The alpine meadow is one of the most important ecosystems in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP), and critically sensitive to climate change and human activities. Thus, it is crucial to precisely reveal the current state and predict future trends in the carbon budget of the alpine meadow ecosystem. The objective of this study was to explore the applicability of the Biome-BGC model (BBGC) in the Qinghai Lake Basin (QLB), identify the key parameters affecting the variation of net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and further predict the future trends in carbon budget in the QLB.
Results
The alpine meadow mainly acted as carbon sink during the growing season. For the eco-physiological factors, the YEL (Yearday to end litterfall), YSNG (Yearday to start new growth), CLEC (Canopy light extinction coefficient), FRC:LC (New fine root C: new leaf C), SLA (Canopy average specific leaf area), C:Nleaf (C:N of leaves), and FLNR (Fraction of leaf N in Rubisco) were confirmed to be the top seven parameters affecting carbon budget of the alpine meadow. For the meteorological factors, the sensitivity of NEE to precipitation was greater than that to vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and it was greater to radiation than to air temperature. Moreover, the combined effect of two different meteorological factors on NEE was higher than the individual effect of each one. In the future, warming and wetting would enhance the carbon sink capacity of the alpine meadow during the growing season, but extreme warming (over 3.84 ℃) would reduce NEE (about 2.9%) in the SSP5-8.5 scenario.
Conclusion
Overall, the alpine meadow ecosystem in the QLB generally performs as a carbon sink at present and in the future. It is of great significance for the achievement of the goal of carbon neutrality and the management of alpine ecosystems.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Global and Planetary Change
Reference90 articles.
1. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of working Group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021
2. Chen H, Ju P, Zhu QA, Xu XL, Wu N, Gao YH, et al. Carbon and nitrogen cycling on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Nat Rev Earth Env. 2022;3:701–16.
3. Zhang L, Zhou GS, Ji YH, Bai YF. Grassland carbon budget and its driving factors of the subtropical and tropical monsoon region in China during 1961 to 2013. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–11.
4. Ammann C, Neftel A, Jocher M, Fuhrer J, Leifeld J. Effect of management and weather variations on the greenhouse gas budget of two grasslands during a 10-year experiment. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2020;292: 106814.
5. Liang W, Zhang WB, Jin Z, Yan JW, Lü YH, Wang S, et al. Estimation of global grassland net ecosystem carbon exchange using a model tree ensemble approach. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2020; 125(1): e2019JG005034.