Protocol for a feasibility registry-based randomised controlled trial investigating a tailored follow-up service for stroke (A-LISTS)
-
Published:2024-07-30
Issue:1
Volume:10
Page:
-
ISSN:2055-5784
-
Container-title:Pilot and Feasibility Studies
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Pilot Feasibility Stud
Author:
Cadilhac Dominique A.ORCID, Ross Andrew G.ORCID, Bagot Kathleen L.ORCID, Blennerhassett Jannette M.ORCID, Kilkenny Monique F.ORCID, Kim JoosupORCID, Purvis TaraORCID, Barclay Karen M.ORCID, Ellery FionaORCID, Morrison JulieORCID, Cranefield Jennifer, Kleinig Timothy J.ORCID, Grimley RohanORCID, Jaques Katherine, Wong DanaORCID, Murphy Lisa, Russell GrantORCID, Nelson Mark R.ORCID, Thijs VincentORCID, Scott Colin, Middleton SandyORCID,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Stroke affects long-term physical and cognitive function; many survivors report unmet health needs, such as pain or depression. A hospital-led follow-up service designed to address ongoing health problems may avoid unplanned readmissions and improve quality of life.
Methods
This paper outlines the protocol for a registry-based, randomised controlled trial with allocation concealment of participants and outcome assessors. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, we will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, potential effectiveness and cost implications of a new tailored, codesigned, hospital-led follow-up service for people within 6–12 months of stroke. Participants (n = 100) from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry who report extreme health problems on the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L survey between 90 and 180 days after stroke will be randomly assigned (1:1) to intervention (follow-up service) or control (usual care) groups. All participants will be independently assessed at baseline and 12–14-week post-randomisation. Primary outcomes for feasibility are the proportion of participants completing the trial and for intervention participants the proportion that received follow-up services. Acceptability is satisfaction of clinicians and participants involved in the intervention. Secondary outcomes include effectiveness: change in extreme health problems (EQ-5D-3L), unmet needs (Longer-term Unmet Needs questionnaire), unplanned presentations and hospital readmission, functional independence (modified Rankin Scale) and cost implications estimated from self-reported health service utilisation and productivity (e.g. workforce participation). To inform future research or implementation, the design contains a process evaluation including clinical protocol fidelity and an economic evaluation.
Discussion
The results of this study will provide improved knowledge of service design and implementation barriers and facilitators and associated costs and resource implications to inform a future fully powered effectiveness trial of the intervention.
Trial registration
ACTRN12622001015730pr.
Trial sponsor
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, 245 Burgundy Street, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, PH: +61 3 9035 7032
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Feigin VL, Krishnamurthi RV, Parmar P, Norrving B, Mensah GA, Bennett DA, et al. Update on the global burden of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in 1990–2013: the GBD 2013 study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):161–76. 2. Sturm JW, Donnan GA, Dewey HM, Macdonell RA, Gilligan AK, Srikanth V, et al. Quality of life after stroke: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2004;35(10):2340–5. 3. Andrew N, Kilkenny M, Naylor R, Purvis T, Lalor E, Moloczij N, et al. Understanding long-term unmet needs in Australian survivors of stroke. Int J Stroke. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12325. 4. Kilkenny MF, Dalli LL, Kim J, Sundararajan V, Andrew NE, Dewey HM, et al. Factors associated with 90-day readmission after stroke or transient ischemic attack: linked data from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry. Stroke. 2020;51(2):571–8. 5. Kilkenny MF, Kim J, Andrew NE, Sundararajan V, Thrift AG, Katzenellenbogen JM, et al. Maximising data value and avoiding data waste: a validation study in stroke research. Med J Aust. 2019;210(1):27–31.
|
|