The feasibility and acceptability of a rewards system based on food purchasing behaviour in secondary school cashless canteens: the Eat4Treats (E4T) cluster feasibility, non-randomised, controlled intervention study

Author:

Moore Sarah E.,Rooney Ciara,Neville Charlotte E.,McConville Ryan,Kee Frank,McEvoy Claire T.,Woodside Jayne V.,Hanvey Judith,McKinley Michelle C.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background Using rewards may be an effective method to positively influence children’s eating behaviour but evidence to date is limited, particularly in older children. The cashless canteen systems in schools provides a unique opportunity to implement a food-based reward scheme but intervention development work and feasibility testing is needed. The overall aim of the E4T feasibility study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a rewards scheme based on the food purchasing behaviour of pupils in cashless canteens in secondary schools. Methods A non-randomised, controlled, parallel-group cluster feasibility study conducted in four secondary schools (two intervention and two control) serving areas of the highest social deprivation in Northern Ireland. During the 4-month trial, pupils earned points for foods purchased at the school canteen, with better nutritional choices having a higher value. Pupils could exchange the points they earned for rewards (e.g. stationery, vouchers, sports equipment) via the E4T website. Qualitative and quantitative data was collected from year 9 and 10 pupils (boys and girls aged 12–14 years), teachers and canteen staff to address the feasibility questions. Results Two intervention (one urban, one rural) and one control (urban) school completed the study. Seventy-one percent of 12–14-year-old pupils consented to take part; 1% of parents opted their child out of the study. Questionnaire completion rates were high (6 and 11% of questionnaires were partially completed at baseline and follow-up respectively). Collecting data on food consumed in the canteen was challenging logistically. Focus groups with pupils indicated that the overall concept of E4T was well received and there was a high degree of satisfaction with the rewards available. Pupils and teachers made several suggestions for improvements. Conclusions E4T was successfully implemented as a result of collaboration between schools, school canteens and cashless canteen providers working with a multidisciplinary research team. It was acceptable to pupils, teachers and canteen staff. The findings suggest a few areas for refining implementation and evaluation processes that would need to be considered in the design of a larger trial, particularly resources required to streamline implementation and ways to optimise pupil engagement. Trial registration Under review with https://www.clinicaltrials.gov (retrospective registration—reg number and weblink to be added).

Funder

Northern Ireland Public Health Agency

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference31 articles.

1. Bates B, Cox L, Nicholson S, Page P, Prentice A, Steer T, et al. National diet and nutrition survey results from years 5 and 6 (combined) of the Rolling Programme (2012/2013 – 2013/2014). Public Health England and Food Standards Agency. 2016. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/551352/NDNS_Y5_6_UK_Main_Text.pdf. Accessed 23 Jul 2022.

2. Office for National Statistics. Statistics on obesity, physical activity and diet, England, 2019. National Health Service Digital. 2019. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/statistics-on-obesity-physical-activity-and-diet/statistics-on-obesity-physical-activity-and-diet-england-2019/part-6-diet#childhood-fruit-and-vegetable-consumption. Accessed 23 Jul 2022.

3. Office for National Statistics. Households below average income, statistics on the number and percentage of people living in low income households for financial years 1994/95 to 2019/20, Table 4.3tr. Department for Work and Pensions. 2021. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/875261/households-below-average-income-1994-1995-2018-2019.pdf. Accessed 23 Jul 2022.

4. Office for National Statistics. Households below average income, statistics on the number and percentage of people living in low income households for financial years 1994/95 to 2019/20, Table 4_5db. Department for Work and Pensions. 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/households-below-average-income-for-financial-years-ending-1995-to-2020/households-below-average-income-an-analysis-of-the-income-distribution-fye-1995-to-fye-2020. Accessed 23 Jul 2022.

5. Gould R, Russell J, Barker ME. School lunch menus and 11 to 12 year old children’s food choice in three secondary schools in England – are the nutritional standards being met? Appetite. 2006;46:86–92.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3