Usefulness of K-line in predicting prognosis of laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Author:

Ikeda TerumasaORCID,Miyamoto Hiroshi,Akagi Masao

Abstract

Abstract Background K-line is widely recognized as a useful index for evaluating cervical alignment and the size of the cervical ossification at the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the K-line could be a useful clinical tool for predicting the prognosis of laminoplasty (LP) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods Adult CSM patients scheduled for cervical LP were recruited for this study. C2-7 angle, local kyphosis angle, and K-line was evaluated by T2-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical findings were evaluated by the JOA score and the recovery rate. Clinical and radiological findings were evaluated preoperation and final follow-up. Patients were grouped into K-line ( +) and K-line (-). Patients with Kline (-) were further divided into two sub-groups: disc type (anterior cord compression due to disc protrusion with kyphosis) and osseous type (due to osseous structure such as osteophyte). Results Sixty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The recovery rate of K-line (-) group (n = 11,19.4%) was significantly worse than that of K-line ( +) group (n = 57, 50.6%, p<0.05). Among 11 K-line (-) patients, 7 were disc type and 4 were osseous type. Over the period of follow-up, the disc type K-line (-) patients changed to K-line ( +) and showed significantly better recovery rate (27.6%) compared to the osseous type K-line (-) group (5.0%, p < 0.05). Conclusion The present of this study indicate that K-line may have a predictive value for clinical outcome in patients undergoing LP for CSM. K-line (-) of osseous type was worse than k-line (-) of disc type.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Rheumatology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3