Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The wrist joint is a complex anatomical structure, and various radiographic parameters are utilized to assess its normal alignment and orientation. Among these parameters are carpal height ratio (CHR) and ulnar variance (UV). Previous literature has indicated that factors such as age and gender may influence these parameters; However, there is a lack of studies investigating these differences specifically in the Middle East or Jordan. Additionally, no prior research has explored the relationship between UV and CHR. Therefore, the objective of this study is to investigate these critical radiological parameters and their associations.
Methodology
A cross-sectional study design was employed, wherein a total of 385 normal wrist X-rays were reviewed, and CHR and UV were measured. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability assessments were conducted to ensure the consistency and accuracy of measurements. Additionally, the association between UV and CHR was measured and plotted for further analysis.
Results
In our study, the mean CHR was 0.5 (range: 0.4 to 1.5), and the mean UV was − 0.3 mm (range: -5.8 mm to 4.1 mm). We found a significant negative correlation between CHR and age (p < 0.05). No significant gender differences were observed in UV and CHR. Additionally, a weak positive correlation was found between UV and CHR (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.13, p = 0.01; adjusted R2 = 0.014, p = 0.02).
Conclusion
Age correlated significantly with a decline in carpal height ratio. Additionally, ulnar variance had a week positive yet significant correlation with carpal height ratio.
Level of evidence
Cross-sectional study, Level III.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Erwin J, Varacallo M. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Wrist Joint, StatPearls, Sep. 2023, Accessed: Mar. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534779/
2. Mann FA, Wilson AJ, Gilula LA. Jul., Radiographic evaluation of the wrist: what does the hand surgeon want to know? https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.184.1.1609073, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 1992, https://doi.org/10.1148/RADIOLOGY.184.1.1609073
3. Murakoshi K, Toki H, Horiuchi T, Saito S. Prediction of wrist prognosis in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis according to Radiographic classification. J Hand Surg Am. May 2009;34(5):824–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.01.016
4. Agrawal S, Chabra T, Pandey S, Bhardwaj P. Intra- and Inter-observer Variability in Different Methods of Measuring Carpal Collapse, Malaysian Orthop. J, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 20–24, Mar. 2019, https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1903.003
5. Feipel V, Rinnen D, Rooze M. Postero-anterior radiography of the wrist: Normal database of carpal measurements, Surg. Radiol. Anat 1998 203, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 221–226, Jul. 1998, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00276-998-0221-0