Author:
Elimian Kelly,Musah Anwar,Dewa Ozius,King Carina,Crawford Katerina,Pembi Emmanuel,Ike Ifeanyi,Myles Puja,Pritchard Catherine,Forsberg Birger Carl,Alfven Tobias
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Limited healthcare facility (HCF) resources and capacity to implement multi-stranded cholera interventions (water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), surveillance, case management, and community engagement) can hinder the actualisation of the global strategic roadmap goals for cholera control, especially in settings made fragile by armed conflicts, such as the north-east region of Nigeria. Therefore, we aimed to assess HCF resource availability and capacity to implement these cholera interventions in Adamawa and Bauchi States in Nigeria as well as assess their coordination in both states and Abuja where national coordination of cholera is based.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional survey using a face-to-face structured questionnaire to collect data on multi-stranded cholera interventions and their respective indicators in HCFs. We generated scores to describe the resource availability of each cholera intervention and categorised them as follows: 0–50 (low), 51–70 (moderate), 71–90 (high), and over 90 (excellent). Further, we defined an HCF with a high capacity to implement a cholera intervention as one with a score equal to or above the average intervention score.
Results
One hundred and twenty HCFs (55 in Adamawa and 65 in Bauchi) were surveyed in March 2021, most of which were primary healthcare centres (83%; 99/120). In both states, resource availability for WASH indicators had high to excellent median scores; surveillance and community engagement indicators had low median scores. Median resource availability scores for case management indicators ranged from low to moderate. Coordination of cholera interventions in Adamawa State and Abuja was high but low in Bauchi State. Overall, HCF capacity to implement multi-stranded cholera interventions was high, though higher in Adamawa State than in Bauchi State.
Conclusions
The study found a marked variation in HCF resource availability and capacity within locations and by cholera interventions and identified cholera interventions that should be prioritised for strengthening as surveillance and laboratory, case management, and community engagement. The findings support adopting a differential approach to strengthening cholera interventions for better preparedness and response to cholera outbreaks.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Ali M, Lopez AL, You Y, Kim Y, Sah B, Maskery B, Clemens J. The global burden of cholera. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:209–18.
2. Perez-Saez J, Lessler J, Lee EC, Luquero FJ, Malembaka EB, Finger F, Langa JP, Yennan S, Zaitchik B, Azman AS. The seasonality of cholera in sub-Saharan Africa: a statistical modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2022;10:e831–9.
3. Cholera Platform. Cholera outbreaks in Central and West Africa: 2020 Regional Update-Week 1–53. 2020.
4. Elimian K, Yennan S, Musah A, et al. Epidemiology, diagnostics and factors associated with mortality during a cholera epidemic in Nigeria, October 2020-October 2021: a retrospective analysis of national surveillance data. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e063703.
5. Global Task Force on Cholera Control. Ending cholera: a global roadmap to 2030. 2017. p. 32.