Variability in white blood cell count during uncomplicated malaria and implications for parasite density estimation: a WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network individual patient data meta-analysis

Author:

,Wynberg Elke,Commons Robert J.,Humphreys Georgina,Ashurst Hazel,Burrow Rebekah,Adjei George O.,Adjuik Martin,Anstey Nicholas M.,Anvikar Anup,Baird Kevin J.,Barber Bridget E.,Barennes Hubert,Baudin Elisabeth,Bell David J.,Bethell Delia,Binh Tran Quang,Borghini-Fuhrer Isabelle,Chu Cindy S.,Daher Andre,D’Alessandro Umberto,Das Debashish,Davis Timothy M. E.,de Vries Peter J.,Djimde Abdoulaye A.,Dondorp Arjen M.,Dorsey Grant,Faucher Jean-François F.,Fogg Carole,Gaye Oumar,Grigg Matthew,Hatz Christoph,Kager Piet A.,Lacerda Marcus,Laman Moses,Mårtensson Andreas,Menan Herv Ignace Eby,Monteiro Wuelton M.,Moore Brioni R.,Nosten Francois,Ogutu Bernhards,Osorio Lyda,Penali Louis K.,Pereira Dhelio B.,Rahim Awab G.,Ramharter Michael,Sagara Issaka,Schramm Birgit,Seidlein Lorenz,Siqueira Andre M.,Sirima Sodiomon B.,Starzengruber Peter,Sutanto Inge,Taylor Walter R.,Toure Offianan A.,Utzinger Jürg,Valea Innocent,Valentini Giovanni,White Nicholas J.,William Timothy,Woodrow Charles J.,Richmond Caitlin L.,Guerin Philippe J.,Price Ric N.,Stepniewska Kasia

Abstract

Abstract Background The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that when peripheral malarial parasitaemia is quantified by thick film microscopy, an actual white blood cell (WBC) count from a concurrently collected blood sample is used in calculations. However, in resource-limited settings an assumed WBC count is often used instead. The aim of this study was to describe the variability in WBC count during acute uncomplicated malaria, and estimate the impact of using an assumed value of WBC on estimates of parasite density and clearance. Methods Uncomplicated malaria drug efficacy studies that measured WBC count were selected from the WorldWide Antimalarial Resistance Network data repository for an individual patient data meta-analysis of WBC counts. Regression models with random intercepts for study-site were used to assess WBC count variability at presentation and during follow-up. Inflation factors for parasitaemia density, and clearance estimates were calculated for methods using assumed WBC counts (8000 cells/µL and age-stratified values) using estimates derived from the measured WBC value as reference. Results Eighty-four studies enrolling 27,656 patients with clinically uncomplicated malaria were included. Geometric mean WBC counts (× 1000 cells/µL) in age groups < 1, 1–4, 5–14 and ≥ 15 years were 10.5, 8.3, 7.1, 5.7 and 7.5, 7.0, 6.5, 6.0 for individuals with falciparum (n = 24,978) and vivax (n = 2678) malaria, respectively. At presentation, higher WBC counts were seen among patients with higher parasitaemia, severe anaemia and, for individuals with vivax malaria, in regions with shorter regional relapse periodicity. Among falciparum malaria patients, using an assumed WBC count of 8000 cells/µL resulted in parasite density underestimation by a median (IQR) of 26% (4–41%) in infants < 1 year old but an overestimation by 50% (16–91%) in adults aged ≥ 15 years. Use of age-stratified assumed WBC values removed systematic bias but did not improve precision of parasitaemia estimation. Imprecision of parasite clearance estimates was only affected by the within-patient WBC variability over time, and remained < 10% for 79% of patients. Conclusions Using an assumed WBC value for parasite density estimation from a thick smear may lead to underdiagnosis of hyperparasitaemia and could adversely affect clinical management; but does not result in clinically consequential inaccuracies in the estimation of the prevalence of prolonged parasite clearance and artemisinin resistance.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Parasitology

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3