Evaluation of the effectiveness of four alternative approaches for the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 global pandemic

Author:

Zeng Xiao,Liu Shuang,Shen SiHong,Shen Hong,Luo De-yi

Abstract

Abstract Backgroud To evaluate four different alternatives to the classical cough test during a urodynamic study in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Patients who needed to undergo a urodynamic study (UDS) at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between April 2021 and May 2021 were randomly selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. During the UDS process, we used four alternative methods to the “cough test”: 1) quickly pressing the bladder area, 2) performing the Valsalva maneuver, 3) performing the Kegel maneuver, and 4) letting the patient close their mouth while performing the cough test. The "cough" waveform amplitudes and characteristics of the graphics were obtained and compared with the classical cough test. Results A total of 120 patients (89 men, 31 women) were included in the study. There was no significant difference between the cough waveform amplitude induced by the Valsalva maneuver compared with the classical cough test (P = 0.182); there was no significant difference between the cough waveform amplitude induced by the cough test with the mouth closed and the classical cough test (P = 0.342); there was no significant difference between pressing quickly on the bladder area and the classical method (P = 0.076); and there was a significant difference between the data obtained by the Kegel maneuver and the classical method (P < 0.05). The average "cough" amplitudes obtained were 73.14 ± 22.48 cm H2O, 66.17 ± 17.12 cm H2O, 82.93 ± 18.95 cm H2O, 26.50 ± 8.68 cm H2O, and 68.90 ± 20.32 cm H2O by the classical cough test, by quickly pressing the bladder area, by the Valsalva maneuver, by the Kegel maneuver, and by coughing with a closed mouth, respectively. Conclusion Quickly pressing the bladder area, performing the Valsalva maneuver, and letting the patient close their mouth while performing the cough test can all provide effective cough waveforms and amplitudes. Trial registration No. 2021–183.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Urology,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine

Reference18 articles.

1. Clement KD, Burden H, Warren K, et al. Invasive urodynamic studies for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with voiding dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4(4):CD011179.

2. Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):261–74.

3. Rosier PFWM, Schaefer W, Lose G, et al. International Continence Society Good Urodynamic Practices and Terms 2016: Urodynamics, uroflowmetry, cystometry, and pressure-flow study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(5):1243–60.

4. Chen H, Guo J, Wang C, Luo F, Yu X, Zhang W, Li J, Zhao D, Xu D, Gong Q, Liao J, Yang H, Hou W, Zhang Y. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: A retrospective review of medical records. Lancet. 2020;395(10226):809–15.

5. WHO. COVID-19 as a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) under the IHR. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2020. https://extranet.who.int/sph/covid-19-public-health-emergency-international-concern-pheic-under-ihr (Accessed 14 June, 2020).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3