Author:
Bitaraf Masoud,Mahdavi Sharif Pouya,Torabinavid Parham,Kajbafzadeh Abdol-Mohammad
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To represent the long-term outcomes of our modified single-stage technique for the reconstruction of isolated penopubic epispadias in male patients.
Patients and methods
Data from 113 patients were obtained from bladder-exstrophy-epispadias database of our tertiary center. A total of seven boys with isolated penopubic epispadias with no prior history of surgery and any other anomaly underwent our modified surgical approach from February 1997 to September 2019. The mean ± SD age at surgery was 6.5 ± 2.4 years. Volitional voiding status and cosmetic appearance were evaluated at each follow-up interval. Postoperative follow-up was performed at quarterly intervals in the first year and once a year in subsequent years.
Results
The mean ± SD of follow-up was 8.5 ± 6 years. All boys who were incontinent achieved urinary control and the ability of normal transurethral micturition following the surgery. Four boys became completely dry, and the other three attained social dryness. Postoperative mean (SD) bladder capacity was significantly increased from 54.5 (11) to 124 (40.0) within 6 months, and to 194 (47.5) at 18 months after surgery. Dorsal curvature has been resolved in all cases, and no postoperative complications were noted except for surgical site infection in one patient treated with antibiotics and bilateral vesicourethral reflux resolved after injection of bulking agents. Four patients had normal erectile function and ejaculation, while the others have not reached puberty yet. Moreover, none of the patients developed urethrocutaneous fistula, stricture, or penile ischemia.
Conclusion
The present findings suggest the safety and effectiveness of the combination of single-stage urethro-genitoplasty, bladder neck plication, and fat pad pedicled flap in management of boys with isolated penopubic epispadias that can lead to the achievement of urinary control, acceptable sexual function, and cosmetically satisfactory genitalia. Minimal morbidity, low complication rate, and promising outcomes are essential factors, supporting the notion of introducing this technique as a valid option for management of this entity.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Urology,Reproductive Medicine,General Medicine
Reference30 articles.
1. Diamond DA, Ransley PG. Male epispadias. J Urol. 1995;154(6):2150–5.
2. Gearhart J, Di Carlo HN, Partin A, Dmochowski R, Kavoussi L, Peters C. Exstrophy-epispadias complex: Campbell-Walsh-Wein urology. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2021.
3. Grady RW, Mitchell ME. Management of epispadias. Urol Clin. 2002;29(2):349–60.
4. Frimberger D, editor. Diagnosis and management of epispadias: seminars in pediatric surgery. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011.
5. Gearhart J, Jeffs R. Extrophy-epispadias complex and bladder anomalies. In: Campbell’s urology, 7th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co. 1998. Pp. 1939–90.