Author:
Jing Qiang,Liu Fan,Yuan Xiaobin,Zhang Xuhui,Cao Xiaoming
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of single-use and reusable digital flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of lower pole stones.
Methods
We enrolled 135 patients underwent reusable flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) and 78 patients underwent single-use digital FURS. Demographic, clinical variables, anatomical parameters of the lower calyx and perioperative indicators were compared in the two groups.
Results
Thirty-six patients in the infundibuloureter angle (IPA) < 45° subgroup had a mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL), including 25 patients in the reusable FURS group and 11 patients in the single-use FURS group. The demographic and clinical variables in the two FURS groups were comparable. There was no statistical difference in the success rate of stone searching (P > 0.05). In terms of the success rate of lithotripsy, there was also no statistical difference in the IPA ≥ 45° subgroup (P > 0.05), whereas single-use FURS was superior in the IPA < 45° subgroup (χ2 = 6.513, P = 0.011). The length of the working fiber in the reusable FURS and single-use FURS groups was 3.20 ± 0.68 mm and 1.75 ± 0.47 mm, respectively (t = 18.297, P < 0.05). The use of a stone basket in the reusable FURS (31/135, 23.0%) was significantly higher than that in the single-use FURS (8/78, 10.3%) (χ2 = 5.336, P = 0.021). Compared with the reusable FURS group, the single-use FURS group had shorter operation times (P < 0.05) and higher stone-free rate (SFR) (χ2 = 4.230, P = 0.040). There was no statistical difference in the intraoperative transfer of mini-PCNL and postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusions
Single-use and reusable FURS are alternative methods for removal of lower pole stones (i.e., 2 cm or less). Single-use FURS has a high success rate of lithotripsy, shorter operation time, and high stone-free rate.
Funder
Scientific Research Project of Shanxi Provincial Health Commission
Shanxi basic research project
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, et al. Surgical management of stones: American urological association/endourologyical society guideline, PART II. J Urol. 2016;196(4):1161–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091.
2. Dretler SP, Cho G. Semirigid ureteroscopy: a new genre. J Urol. 1989;141(6):1314–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41292-4.
3. Hirschowitz BI, Peters CW, Curtis LE. Preliminary reports on a long fiberscope for examination of the stomach and duodenum. Med Bull (Ann Arbor). 1957;23(5):178–80.
4. Smith AD, Preminger G, Badlani G, et al. Smith’s textbook of endourology. 3rd ed. Hamilton: Wiley; p. 365–387.
5. Santos JMR. Ureteroscopy from the recent past to the near future. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(1):31–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-1016-8. Epub 2017 Nov 29.