Author:
Bloch Nando,Männer Jasmin,Gardiol Céline,Kohler Philipp,Kuhn Jacqueline,Münzer Thomas,Schlegel Matthias,Kuster Stefan P.,Flury Domenica
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Healthcare-associated infections in long-term care are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. While infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines are well-defined in the acute care setting, evidence of effectiveness for long-term care facilities (LTCF) is missing. We therefore performed a systematic literature review to examine the effect of IPC measures in the long-term care setting.
Methods
We systematically searched PubMed and Cochrane libraries for articles evaluating the effect of IPC measures in the LTCF setting since 2017, as earlier reviews on this topic covered the timeframe up to this date. Cross-referenced studies from identified articles and from mentioned earlier reviews were also evaluated. We included randomized-controlled trials, quasi-experimental, observational studies, and outbreak reports. The included studies were analyzed regarding study design, type of intervention, description of intervention, outcomes and quality. We distinguished between non-outbreak and outbreak settings.
Results
We included 74 studies, 34 (46%) in the non-outbreak setting and 40 (54%) in the outbreak setting. The most commonly studied interventions in the non-outbreak setting included the effect of hand hygiene (N = 10), oral hygiene (N = 6), antimicrobial stewardship (N = 4), vaccination of residents (N = 3), education (N = 2) as well as IPC bundles (N = 7). All but one study assessing hand hygiene interventions reported a reduction of infection rates. Further successful interventions were oral hygiene (N = 6) and vaccination of residents (N = 3). In outbreak settings, studies mostly focused on the effects of IPC bundles (N = 24) or mass testing (N = 11). In most of the studies evaluating an IPC bundle, containment of the outbreak was reported. Overall, only four articles (5.4%) were rated as high quality.
Conclusion
In the non-outbreak setting in LTCF, especially hand hygiene and oral hygiene have a beneficial effect on infection rates. In contrast, IPC bundles, as well as mass testing seem to be promising in an outbreak setting.
Funder
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference91 articles.
1. https://www.crossrivertherapy.com/long-term-care-statistics.
2. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=Healthcare_resource_statistics_-_beds&oldid=567775#:~:text=In%202020%2C%20there%20were%20approximately,Germany%2C%20Greece%20and%20Cyprus.
3. Cassini A, Plachouras D, Eckmanns T, Abu Sin M, Blank HP, Ducomble T, et al. Burden of six healthcare-associated infections on European population health: estimating incidence-based disability-adjusted life years through a population prevalence-based modelling study. Harbarth S, editor. PLOS Med. 2016;13(10):e1002150.
4. Héquet D, Kessler S, Rettenmund G, Lemmenmeier E, Qalla-Widmer L, Gardiol C, et al. Healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic use in long-term care residents from two geographical regions in Switzerland. J Hosp Infect. 2021;117:172–8.
5. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/covid-19-surveillance-in-long-term-care-facilities-november-2021.pdf.