Author:
Zhu Huan,Wu Yangyang,Zheng Yanling
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cycas multipinnata and C. panzhihuaensis are two attractive ornamental tree species. With the global climate change, the temperature in the natural habitats of both the species shows a marked rising trend. However, how the two species respond to extreme high temperatures are not clear.
Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, chlorophyll content, chloroplast ultrastructure and lipid metabolism in the two species were determined following plant exposure to heat stress.
Results
The results demonstrated that the photosynthetic efficiency decreased significantly in both the species following heat shock and recovery, but to a greater extent in C. panzhihuaensis. Compared to the control, chlorophyll content of C. multipinnata did not change significantly following heat stress and recovery. However, chlorophyll content of C. panzhihuaensis increased significantly after 1 d of recovery in comparison with the control. Chloroplast ultrastructures of C. panzhihuaensis were more severely affected by heat shock than C. multipinnata. C. multipinnata and C. panzhihuaensis followed a similar change trend in the amounts of most of the lipid categories after heat stress. However, only the amounts of lysophospholipids and fatty acyls differed significantly between the two species following heat treatment. Additionally, the unsaturation levels of the major lipid classes in C. multipinnata were significantly lower than or equal to those in C. panzhihuaensis.
Conclusions
C. multipinnata was less affected by extremely high temperatures than C. panzhihuaensis. The differential stability of chlorophyll and chloroplast ultrastructure and the differential adjustment of lipid metabolism might contribute to the different responses to heat shock between the two species.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference103 articles.
1. IPCC. Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM, editors. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 1–30.
2. Coffel ED, Horton RM, de Sherbinin A. Temperature and humidity based projections of a rapid rise in global heat stress exposure during the 21st century. Environ Res Lett. 2018;13:014001.
3. Horton RM, Coffel ED, Winter JM, Bader DA. Projected changes in extreme temperature events based on the NARCCAP model suite. Geophys Res Lett. 2015;42:7722–31.
4. Argüeso D, Di Luca A, Perkins-Kirkpatrick SE, Evans JP. Seasonal mean temperature changes control future heat waves. Geophys Res Lett. 2016;43:7653–60.
5. Lohani N, Singh MB, Bhalla PL. High temperature susceptibility of sexual reproduction in crop plants. J Exp Bot. 2020;71:555–68.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献