Abstract
Abstract
Background
Chronic wounds have a major impact on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Therefore, measuring HRQoL is an indispensable part of the treatment of patients with chronic wounds. The aim of this study was to translate and validate the Wound-QoL, a wound-specific HRQoL questionnaire, in a Dutch population.
Methods
The Wound-QoL was translated into Dutch according to the international standards. Patients with chronic wounds were asked to complete questionnaires at baseline (T0) and after six weeks (T1), including Wound-QoL, EQ-5D-3L (a generic questionnaire to measure HRQoL) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) measuring wound pain. If patients were not able to complete the questionnaire by themselves, it was read out to them by a nurse. Further data were obtained from medical records.
Results
Of the 120 patients included, 64 (53.3%) completed the questionnaire by themselves. To 55 patients (45.8%), the questionnaire was read out. The internal consistency of the Wound-QoL global score was high at both time points (T0: Cronbach’s α = 0.89, T1: Cronbach’s α = 0.92). The item selectivity for global score ranged from r = 0.25 to r = 0.77 at T0 and from r = 0.40 to r = 0.79 at T1. Overall, the self-completion and read-out subgroups showed similar internal consistency and item selectivity scores. With regard to convergent validity, significant correlations were found between Wound-QoL and EQ-5D-3L (T0: r = − 0.45, p < 0.001, T1: r = − 0.50, p < 0.001) as well as between Wound-QoL and pain VAS (T0: r = 0.23, p = 0.012, T1: r = 0.37, p = 0.001) at both time points. Responsiveness analyses showed significant correlations between changes in Wound-QoL and changes in EQ-5D-3L (r = − 0.37, p < 0.001), pain VAS (r = 0.24, p = 0.044) and wound size (r = 0.24, p = 0.013). The self-completion and read-out subgroups showed differences in convergent validity and responsiveness.
Conclusions
The results indicate that the Dutch version of the Wound-QoL has positive psychometric properties. However, more research is needed to further explore the differences between self-completed and read-out questionnaires.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Wondplatform Kwaliteitsstandaard Organisatie van wondzorg in Nederland 2018, available at: https:www.wcs.nl/wp-content/uploads/kwaliteitsstandaard-Organisatie-van-wondzorg-in-Nederland.pdf (last accessed on 10 September 2018).
2. Martinengo L, Olsson M, Bajpai R, Soljak M, Upton Z, Schmidtchen A, et al. Prevalence of chronic wounds in the general population: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2019;29:8–15.
3. Nederlandse Zorgautoriteit. Rapport Innovatie van complexe wondzorg 2014. Available at: https://puc.overheid.nl/nza/doc/PUC_3196_22/1/ (last accessed on 10 September 2018).
4. Amesz S, Monsma M, Corporaal G, Oskam J. Betere wondzorg; 2018.
5. Stoeldraijer L, Van Duin C, Huisman C. CBS - Bevolkingsprognose 2017–2060: 18,4 miljoen inwoners in 2060. CBS - Stat Trends. 2017;19:10.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献