Disentangling land model uncertainty via Matrix-based Ensemble Model Inter-comparison Platform (MEMIP)
-
Published:2022-02-08
Issue:1
Volume:11
Page:
-
ISSN:2192-1709
-
Container-title:Ecological Processes
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ecol Process
Author:
Liao Cuijuan,Chen Yizhao,Wang Jingmeng,Liang Yishuang,Huang Yansong,Lin Zhongyi,Lu Xingjie,Huang Yuanyuan,Tao Feng,Lombardozzi Danica,Arneth Almut,Goll Daniel S.,Jain Atul,Sitch Stephen,Lin Yanluan,Xue Wei,Huang Xiaomeng,Luo Yiqi
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Large uncertainty in modeling land carbon (C) uptake heavily impedes the accurate prediction of the global C budget. Identifying the uncertainty sources among models is crucial for model improvement yet has been difficult due to multiple feedbacks within Earth System Models (ESMs). Here we present a Matrix-based Ensemble Model Inter-comparison Platform (MEMIP) under a unified model traceability framework to evaluate multiple soil organic carbon (SOC) models. Using the MEMIP, we analyzed how the vertically resolved soil biogeochemistry structure influences SOC prediction in two soil organic matter (SOM) models. By comparing the model outputs from the C-only and CN modes, the SOC differences contributed by individual processes and N feedback between vegetation and soil were explicitly disentangled.
Results
Results showed that the multi-layer models with a vertically resolved structure predicted significantly higher SOC than the single layer models over the historical simulation (1900–2000). The SOC difference between the multi-layer models was remarkably higher than between the single-layer models. Traceability analysis indicated that over 80% of the SOC increase in the multi-layer models was contributed by the incorporation of depth-related processes, while SOC differences were similarly contributed by the processes and N feedback between models with the same soil depth representation.
Conclusions
The output suggested that feedback is a non-negligible contributor to the inter-model difference of SOC prediction, especially between models with similar process representation. Further analysis with TRENDY v7 and more extensive MEMIP outputs illustrated the potential important role of multi-layer structure to enlarge the current ensemble spread and the necessity of more detail model decomposition to fully disentangle inter-model differences. We stressed the importance of analyzing ensemble outputs from the fundamental model structures, and holding a holistic view in understanding the ensemble uncertainty.
Funder
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecological Modeling,Ecology
Reference58 articles.
1. Ahlström A, Schurgers G, Smith B (2017) The large influence of climate model bias on terrestrial carbon cycle simulations. Environ Res Lett 12:014004 2. Anav A, Friedlingstein P, Kidston M, Bopp L, Ciais P, Cox P, Jones C, Jung M, Myneni R, Zhu Z (2013) Evaluating the land and ocean components of the global carbon cycle in the CMIP5 earth system models. J Clim 26:6801–6843 3. Arora VK, Katavouta A, Williams RG, Jones CD, Brovkin V, Friedlingstein P, Schwinger J, Bopp L, Boucher O, Cadule P, Chamberlain MA, Christian JR, Delire C, Fisher RA, Hajima T, Ilyina T, Joetzjer E, Kawamiya M, Koven C, Krasting J, Law RM, Lawrence DM, Lenton A, Lindsay K, Pongratz J, Raddatz T, Séférian R, Tachiiri K, Tjiputra JF, Wiltshire A, Wu T, Ziehn T (2020) Carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models, and their comparison to CMIP5 models. Biogeosciences 17:4173–4222 4. Basile SJ, Lin X, Wieder WR, Hartman MD, Keppel-Aleks G (2020) Leveraging the signature of heterotrophic respiration on atmospheric CO2 for model benchmarking. Biogeosciences 17:1293–1308 5. Bonan GB, Lombardozzi DL, Wieder WR, Oleson KW, Lawrence DM, Hoffman FM, Collier N (2019) Model structure and climate data uncertainty in historical simulations of the terrestrial carbon cycle (1850–2014). Glob Biogeochem Cycles 33:1310–1326
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Matrix Approach to Accelerate Spin‐Up of CLM5;Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems;2023-08
|
|