Artificial intelligent tools: evidence-mapping on the perceived positive effects on patient-care and confidentiality

Author:

Botha Nkosi N.ORCID,Ansah Edward W.ORCID,Segbedzi Cynthia E.ORCID,Dumahasi Victor K.ORCID,Maneen SamuelORCID,Kodom Ruby V.ORCID,Tsedze Ivy S.ORCID,Akoto Lucy A.ORCID,Atsu Fortune S.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background Globally, healthcare systems have always contended with well-known and seemingly intractable challenges like safety, quality, efficient and effective clinical and administrative patient-care services. To firmly confront these and other healthcare challenges, the World Health Organisation proposed a full adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) applications into patient care to stimulate efficiency and guarantee quality in patient management. Purpose This review aimed to establish the extent and type of evidence of the positive effects of the use of AI tools in patient care. Thus, the review mapped evidence by using articles published between January 1, 2010, and October 31, 2023. Methods Consistent with the protocol by Tricco et al., a comprehensive literature search was executed from Nature, PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Dimensions, Web of Science, Ebsco Host, ProQuest, JStore, Semantic Scholar, Taylor & Francis, Emeralds, World Health Organisation, and Google Scholar. Upholding the inclusion and exclusion standards, 95 peer-reviewed articles were included in this review. Findings We report that the use of AI tools can significantly improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis to guarantee better patient health outcomes. AI tools also have the ability to mitigate, if not eliminate, most of the factors that currently predict poor patient outcomes. Furthermore, AI tools are far more efficient in generating robust and accurate data in real time and can help ease and accelerate workflow at healthcare facilities. Conclusion If properly integrated into the healthcare system, AI will help reduce patients’ waiting time and accelerate the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals 3.4, 3.8, and 3.b. We propose that AI developers collaborate with public health practitioners and healthcare managers to develop AI applications that appreciate socio-cultural dimensions in patient care.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3