Author:
Galanter William,Rodríguez-Fernández Jorge Mario,Chow Kevin,Harford Samuel,Kochendorfer Karl M.,Pishgar Maryam,Theis Julian,Zulueta John,Darabi Houshang
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Many models are published which predict outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The generalizability of many is unknown. We evaluated the performance of selected models from the literature and our own models to predict outcomes in patients at our institution.
Methods
We searched the literature for models predicting outcomes in inpatients with COVID-19. We produced models of mortality or criticality (mortality or ICU admission) in a development cohort. We tested external models which provided sufficient information and our models using a test cohort of our most recent patients. The performance of models was compared using the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC).
Results
Our literature review yielded 41 papers. Of those, 8 were found to have sufficient documentation and concordance with features available in our cohort to implement in our test cohort. All models were from Chinese patients. One model predicted criticality and seven mortality. Tested against the test cohort, internal models had an AUC of 0.84 (0.74–0.94) for mortality and 0.83 (0.76–0.90) for criticality. The best external model had an AUC of 0.89 (0.82–0.96) using three variables, another an AUC of 0.84 (0.78–0.91) using ten variables. AUC’s ranged from 0.68 to 0.89. On average, models tested were unable to produce predictions in 27% of patients due to missing lab data.
Conclusion
Despite differences in pandemic timeline, race, and socio-cultural healthcare context some models derived in China performed well. For healthcare organizations considering implementation of an external model, concordance between the features used in the model and features available in their own patients may be important. Analysis of both local and external models should be done to help decide on what prediction method is used to provide clinical decision support to clinicians treating COVID-19 patients as well as what lab tests should be included in order sets.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Health Policy,Computer Science Applications
Reference67 articles.
1. Taubenberger JK, Morens DM. 1918 Influenza: the mother of all pandemics. Rev Biomed. 2006;17(1):69–79.
2. Bhutta N, Blair J, Dettling LJ, Moore KB. COVID-19, the CARES Act, and families' financial security. SSRN 2020. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3631903.
3. De Dombal F, Leaper D, Staniland JR, McCann A, Horrocks JC. Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Br Med J. 1972;2(5804):9–13.
4. Ranson J, Rifkind K, Roses D, Fink S, Spencer F. Prognostic signs and the role of operative management in acute pancreatitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974;139(1):69–81.
5. Kuo DC, Rider AC, Estrada P, Kim D, Pillow MT. Acute pancreatitis: what’s the score? J Emerg Med. 2015;48(6):762–70.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献