Author:
Zang YaNing,Liu ShanShan,Chen YuHong
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Promoting patient participation in decision-making aims to maintain the partnership between doctors and patients, reflect the patients’ goals, values, and preferences, and achieve patient-centered care. Realizing patient-centered care, shared collaboration between doctors and patients, and the decision-making process that considers the patients’ priorities and goals are the keys to high-quality health care. Therefore, it is indispensable to analyze the patients’ willingness to participate in the decision-making process and related participation needs regarding anticoagulation treatment for patients undergoing valve replacement.
Purpose
To analyze the patients’ willingness to participate in the decision-making process and the participation needs of patients undergoing mechanical cardiac valve replacement in the process of anticoagulation therapy to provide a basis for promoting patients' participation in decision-making.
Methods
Using phenomenological research methods, data were collected through semistructured interviews. Patients were interviewed after mechanical valve replacement from June to August 2021 in a Grade A hospital in Nanjing. Data were analyzed according to the Colaizzi phenomenology method.
Results
Three major themes were identified from the data: strong willingness to participate but low actual participation, supportive needs, and family members’ participation.
Conclusions
This study guided interventions to encourage patients who underwent heart valve replacement to participate in the decision-making process. From the patient's perspective, obtaining support in the decision-making process and caregiver enthusiasm is important. This study prompted thoughts about the use of auxiliary tools and provided a reliable basis for constructing decision-making auxiliary programs to guide clinical practice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Informatics,Health Policy,Computer Science Applications
Reference35 articles.
1. Christensen TD, Skjøth F, Nielsen PB, Maegaard M, Grove EL, Larsen TB. Self-management of anticoagulant therapy in mechanical heart valve patients: a matched cohort study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(4):1494–9.
2. Li BX, Liu SD, Qi L, et al. Comparison of different bridging anticoagulation therapies used after mechanical heart valve replacement in Chinese patients—a prospective cohort study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;15(1):40.
3. MacIsaac S, Jaffer IH, Belley-Côté EP, McClure GR, Eikelboom JW, Whitlock RP. How did we get here?: a historical review and critical analysis of anticoagulation therapy following mechanical valve replacement. Circulation. 2019;140(23):1933–42.
4. Vaanholt MCW, Weernink MGM, von Birgelen C, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, IJzerman MJ, van Til JA. Perceived advantages and disadvantages of oral anticoagulants, and the trade-offs patients make in choosing anticoagulant therapy and adhering to their drug regimen. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(11):1982–9.
5. Huang R, Yang X, Song X, Victor MM, Henry HT. The current status and expectation of shared-decision making in Chinese patients with cardiovascular diseases. Med Philos. 2017;38(10):5–10 (in Chinese).