Turning the tide: understanding estuarine detection range variability via structural equation models

Author:

Bruneel Stijn,Goossens Jolien,Reubens Jan,Pauwels Ine,Moens Tom,Goethals Peter,Verhelst Pieterjan

Abstract

AbstractInsight into the detection range of acoustic telemetry systems is crucial for both sampling design and data interpretation. The detection range is highly dependent on the environmental conditions and can consequently be substantially different among aquatic systems. Also within systems, temporal variability can be significant. The number of studies to assess the detection range in different systems has been growing, though there remains a knowledge gap in estuarine habitats. In this study, a 2-month experimental set-up was used to assess the detection range variability and affecting environmental factors of an estuary. Given the expected complex interplay of different factors and the difficulties it entails for interpretation, a structural equation modelling (pSEM) approach is proposed. The detection range of this estuarine study was relatively low and variable (average 50% detectability of 106 m and ranging between 72 and 229 m) compared to studies of riverine and marine systems. The structural equation models revealed a clear, yet complex, tidal pattern in detection range variability which was mainly affected by water speed (via ambient noise and tilt of the receivers), water depth and wind speed. The negative effect of ambient noise and positive effect of water depth became more pronounced at larger distances. Ambient noise was not only affected by water speed, but also by water depth, precipitation, tilt angle and wind speed. Although the tilt was affected by water speed, water depth and wind speed, most of the variability in tilt could be traced back to the receiver locations. Similarly, the receiver locations seemed to explain a considerable portion of the detection range variability. Retrospective power analyses indicated that for most factors only a minor gain in explanatory power was achieved after more than two days of data collecting. Redirecting some of the sampling effort towards more spatially extensive measurements seems to be a relevant manner to improve the insights in the performance of telemetry systems in estuarine environments. Since the low and variable detection range in estuaries can seriously hamper ecological inferences, range tests with sound sampling designs and appropriate modelling techniques are paramount.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Instrumentation,Animal Science and Zoology,Signal Processing

Reference50 articles.

1. Bruneel S, Ho L, Van Echelpoel W, Schoeters A, Raat H, Moens T, Bermudez R, Luca S, Goethals P. Sampling errors and variability in video transects for assessment of reef fish assemblage structure and diversity. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(7):0271043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271043.

2. Kessel ST, Cooke SJ, Heupel MR, Hussey NE, Simpfendorfer CA, Vagle S, Fisk AT. A review of detection range testing in aquatic passive acoustic telemetry studies. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries. 2014;24(1):199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-013-9328-4.

3. Alós J, Aarestrup K, Abecasis D, Afonso P, Alonso-Fernandez A, Aspillaga E, Barcelo-Serra M, Bolland J, Cabanellas-Reboredo M, Lennox R, McGill R, Özgül A, Reubens J, Villegas-Ríos D. Toward a decade of ocean science for sustainable development through acoustic animal tracking. Glob Change Biol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16343.

4. Matley JK, Klinard NV, Barbosa Martins AP, Aarestrup K, Aspillaga E, Cooke SJ, Cowley PD, Heupel MR, Lowe CG, Lowerre-Barbieri SK, Mitamura H, Moore JS, Simpfendorfer CA, Stokesbury MJW, Taylor MD, Thorstad EB, Vandergoot CS, Fisk AT. Global trends in aquatic animal tracking with acoustic telemetry. Trends Ecol Evol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.09.001.

5. Murray TS, Elston C, Parkinson MC, Filmalter JD, Cowley PD. A decade of South Africa’s acoustic tracking array platform: an example of a successful ocean stewardship programme. Front Mar Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.886554.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3