Abstract
Abstract
Background
Some patients involved in a road traffic collision (RTC) are physically entrapped and extrication is required to provide critical interventions. This can be performed either in an expedited way, or in a more controlled manner. In this study we aimed to derive a data-driven extrication algorithm intended to be used as a decision-support tool by on scene emergency service providers to decide on the optimal method of patient extrication from the vehicle.
Methods
A retrospective observational study was performed of all trauma patients trapped after an RTC who were attended by a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) in the United Kingdom between March 2013 and December 2021. Variables were identified that were associated with the need for HEMS interventions (as a surrogate for the need for expedited extrication), based on which a practical extrication algorithm was devised.
Results
During the study period 12,931 patients were attended, of which 920 were physically trapped. Patients who scored an “A” on the AVPU score (n = 531) rarely required HEMS interventions (3%). Those who did were characterised by a shorter than average (29 vs. 37 min) 999/112 emergency call to HEMS on-scene arrival interval. A third of all patients responding to voice required HEMS interventions. Absence of a patent airway (OR 6.98 [1.74–28.03] p < .001) and the absence of palpable radial pulses (OR 9.99 [2.48–40.18] p < .001) were independently associated with the need for (one or more) HEMS interventions in this group. Patients only responding to pain and unresponsive patients almost invariably needed HEMS interventions post extrication (90% and 86% respectively). Based on these findings, a practical and easy to remember algorithm “APEX” was derived.
Conclusion
A simple, data-driven algorithm, remembered by the acronym “APEX”, may help emergency service providers on scene to determine the preferred method of extrication for patients who are trapped after a road traffic collision. This has the potential to facilitate earlier recognition of a ‘sick’ critical patient trapped in an RTC, decrease entrapment and extrication time, and may contribute to an improved outcome for these patients.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medicine
Reference16 articles.
1. Ginglen JG, Tong H. EMS Gaining Access and Extrication. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [cited 2023 Apr 16]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482471/.
2. Nutbeam T, Fenwick R, Hobson C, Holland V, Palmer M. Extrication time prediction tool. Emerg Med J EMJ. 2015;32(5):401–3.
3. Nutbeam T, Fenwick R, Smith J, Bouamra O, Wallis L, Stassen W. A comparison of the demographics, injury patterns and outcome data for patients injured in motor vehicle collisions who are trapped compared to those patients who are not trapped. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021;29(1).
4. Fenwick R, Nutbeam T. Medical vs. true physical traffic collision entrapment. J Paramed Pract. 2018;10(4):158–62.
5. Cowley A. Self-extrication in road traffic collisions: do we really need to cut the roof off? J Paramed Pract. 2014;6(11):584–8.