Abstract
Abstract
Background
As a result of several violent terrorist incidents, authorities in Sweden have shifted from previous approaches of being certain that it is safe for the ambulance service to enter the scene, to a one where “safe enough” is sufficient, potentially making it possible to save more lives. The aim was therefore to describe specialist ambulance nurses' perceptions of the new approach to assignments involving incidents with ongoing lethal violence.
Methods
This interview study employed a descriptive qualitative design with a phenomenographic approach in accordance with Dahlgren and Fallsberg.
Results
Five categories containing conceptual descriptions were developed from the analysis: Collaboration, Unsafe environments, Resources, Unequipped and Risk taking and self-protection.
Conclusions
The findings highlight the need to ensure that the ambulance service is a learning organisation, where clinicians with experience of an ongoing lethal violence event can pass on and share their knowledge with colleagues to prepare mentally for such an event. Potentially compromised security in the ambulance service when dispatched to ongoing lethal violence incidents needs to be addressed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Emergency Medicine
Reference34 articles.
1. Scannell MJ. Fast facts about forensic nursing: what you need to know. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2018.
2. The Global Terrorism Database (GTD) [https://start.umd.edu/data-tools/global-terrorismdatabase-gtd]. Accessed 20 August 2022.
3. Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. Vägledning – samverkan vid pågående dödligt våld i publik miljö [Guidance - collaboration in the event of ongoing lethal violence in a public environment]. Karlstad: Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap [Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency]; 2018.
4. Brown JM. Force of words: the role of threats in terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence. 2020;32(7):1527–49.
5. Dalafave R, Viscusi WK. Risk-risk tradeoffs for mass shootings and international terrorism. Risk Anal. 2021;41(12):2196–208.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献