Abstract
Abstract
Background
The purpose of this study is to make a philosophical argument against the phenomenological critique of standardization in clinical ethics. We used the context of clinical ethics in Saudi Arabia to demonstrate the importance of credentialing clinical ethicists.
Methods
Philosophical methods of argumentation and conceptual analysis were used.
Results
We found the phenomenological critique of standardization to be flawed because it relies on a series of false dichotomies.
Conclusions
We concluded that the phenomenological framing of the credentialing debate relies upon two extreme views to be navigated between, not chosen among, in the credentialing of clinical ethicists.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference41 articles.
1. Al Mutair A, Al Shaer A, Al Ghamdi F, Al Ghamdi A. The experiences of Muslim family members of critically ill patients during end-of-life care in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative phenomenological study. Clin Nurs Res. 2020;29(6):375–81.
2. Aljethaily A, Al-Mutairi T, Al-Harbi K, Al-Khonezan S, Aljethaily A, Al-Homaidhi HS. Pediatricians’ perceptions toward do not resuscitate: a survey in Saudi Arabia and literature review. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020;11:1.
3. Alkabba AF, Hussein GM, Albar AA, Bahnassy AA, Qadi M. The major medical ethical challenges facing the public and healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia. J Fam Community Med. 2012;19(1):1.
4. Al-Rabeeah A. The history of health care in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with emphasis on pediatric surgery. Saudi Med J. 2003;24(5; SUPP):S9–S10.
5. Baharoon SA, Al-Jahdali HH, Al-Sayyari AA, Tamim H, Babgi Y, Al-Ghamdi SM. Factors associated with decision-making about end-of-life care by hemodialysis patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2010;21(3):447.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献